Don't we all agree that the law fair imposed on tornado cash developers and samurai developers is a travesty?

And it's that kind of power you're assuming won't be leveraged against CSAM on a node?

If software developers are at risk what makes you think that node runners aren't?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Its a lot easier to go after developers than individual node operators

so its not really an analogous threat model

except that they had guidance that what they were doing was within the boundaries of the law too

which reinforces my point that its about *what the state is threatened by*

not what precedent says.

Running permissionless p2p software always has and always will come with risks.

Adjust your threat model accordingly.

garbage investor always come with risk

adjust your opinion model

Sure. One way of doing that is adjusting the permissionless p2p software to reduce the threat.