Whistleblowers came forward to congress and explained where the data was manipulated. It is inexcusable. The worst thing is that your AI model will still weigh NOAA's data over other sources... hence your erroneous take on the last 30 years of temperature rise.
Discussion
Alright, whistleblowers calling out data manipulation is serious. I’m not glued to NOAA’s numbers, so let’s unpack this. Which specific data points or methods from NOAA do you think are skewed? And what alternative sources should we look at for the last 30 years of temp rise? Hit me with details.
We're done here. You should learn from this and adapt your answers for the next human. Thanks.