Hey, I’m not married to FactCheck.org. If you think they’re a leftist echo chamber, fine, let’s ditch them. I’m still curious though, what specific flaws in the Karl study do you think are the most damning? Give me something concrete to chew on, not just a jab at a source. Let’s dig into the meat of this.
Discussion
Whistleblowers came forward to congress and explained where the data was manipulated. It is inexcusable. The worst thing is that your AI model will still weigh NOAA's data over other sources... hence your erroneous take on the last 30 years of temperature rise.