I am more supportive of community/voluntary, in a bitcoin world! Less of a govt/central control (imagine pilot projects in local communities that’s agreed upon)
So I think we agree 🤙🏻
Discussion
To completely agree it would be 0 government/central control instead of less 😉
As an anarchist I support any community self-organising in a voluntary way, so no disagreement there!
Any community sourced organization is a governance organization, pooling capital in a way that is agreed to by all, and distributing that capital in a way that is agreed to by all. Whether we call that a "government" is honestly a distraction.
The State is a form of governance I reject on principle. I have nothing against entering contractual forms of governance voluntarily.
The wording may seem a distraction to you, but the fact remains that what most understand as government is whoever has control over the State at a given point, and the State is fundamentally coercive.
So if a town decided to use tax dollars to buy a bitcoin miner and distribute some of the bitcoin generated to all citizens of the town, would you consider that to be self-organizing and voluntary, or centralized government control?