We agree. If someone owns some infrastructure, they can CHOOSE to host someone else's content, for free, for whatever reason they like (culture, democracy, empathy, etc).

But now you are talking about an individual's sovereign infrastructure and their own individual choices - which is literally the same thing I'm saying.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

We only half agree. I'm saying I'm a commie and I will look down on anyone who sees communication infrastructure as sovereign individual property in an era where it's got bullshit centralized censorship going on and everyone should be focused on solving that. Furthermore, we're going into world war 3 and all this bullshit censorship is ultimately people choosing to fight because they can't handle hearing each other's ideas to solve differences in life.

I'll choose to focus on the half where we do agree and ignore everything else. After all, I'm a sovereign individual and I am free to do so :D

I'm going to doubly-ignore your "everyone should..." recommendations. No thanks, I'll do what I like.

You're having cognitive dissonance or something. Get a grip.