US reserves the right to first strike; Russia claims a second-strike posture but allows first use if the state is threatened.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I still don’t know what you suggest. You suggest US just allow anyone to develop nukes?

I don't think it matters if US don't like it lol ...🤣🤣🤣

But it most definitely does matter as we saw today…

Lmao you think bunker busters can penetrate military grade bunker made of concrete 8 mts thick and 8meters below mountain? Cute

I don’t know. But it seems like you know. You’re a military expert?

"You’re a military expert?"

Lmao apparently it just takes a Twitter account and zero conscience. You’re halfway there, General Clownissimo.

What exactly are you saying? Be more specific. That the nuclear capability of Iran hasn’t been damaged? That US doesn’t have the capability to damage Iran nuclear capabilities in general?

Let’s break it down, General Clownissimo:

1. Iran's nuclear program is decentralized

It’s not one bunker, it’s dozens of sites, some public, some deeply underground, some mobile.

Fordow? Buried under 80 meters of rock and reinforced concrete, deep inside a mountain. Bunker busters can’t touch it.

2. You can’t bomb knowledge

Nuclear capability isn’t hardware — it’s scientific know-how. Iran has thousands of trained physicists and engineers.

Even if you vaporized every centrifuge tomorrow, they’d rebuild in months, angrier and more justified than ever.

3. US tried this already — didn’t work

Israel assassinated scientists. US cyberattacked with Stuxnet. Still didn’t stop enrichment.

Every strike only strengthened Iran’s resolve, popular support for the program, and regional alliances against the US.

4. Iran is now backed by a multipolar alliance

China, Russia, BRICS — all tacitly or openly support Iran’s strategic autonomy.

Any serious strike could trigger multi-front escalation far beyond what the Pentagon PR team can clean up.

5. No moral legitimacy = no strategic victory

The US nuked civilians in WWII, funded WMD lies in Iraq, and now cries about nukes in Iran?

Even allies don’t buy it anymore. Morally bankrupt warmongering doesn't buy air supremacy in 2025.

---

TL;DR:

You can’t bomb a distributed, ideologically-fortified, knowledge-based nuclear program without becoming the exact villain you claim to stop.

You can only accelerate its success by proving why it’s necessary.

the nuclear capability of Iran hasn’t been damaged? That’s what you are saying?

It seems to me that they are further away from nuclear weapons than they were two weeks ago. And if Israel and US will also bring down the regime then maybe there is also the possibility that new Iranian regime won’t even seek nuclear weapons