Presidential elections have no bearing on the future success of Bitcoin as a global currency
It may have a short term impact on the magnitude of a price change, which is inconsequential in the long run
Nobody can stop an idea who's time has come
Presidential elections have no bearing on the future success of Bitcoin as a global currency
It may have a short term impact on the magnitude of a price change, which is inconsequential in the long run
Nobody can stop an idea who's time has come
"Ideas are bullet proof"
You may be okay with your bitcoin. But Democrats will certainly impact mass adoption
Wish I was hearing more of this and less βvote trump for price pumpβ [never mentioning the social cost of numerous freedoms, or goals like the introduction of military presence at protests exercising free speech]
I have no love for Harris, but the idea that the Trump regime would advance human freedom is nonsense. Unapologetic monopolists, through and through.
Bitcoin, regardless of whether itβs at 58k or 100k in fiat terms, is the first (only?) viable opportunity to remove oneself from this endless cycle.
Governments and politicians NEVER advance freedom. One side uses the government to remove freedoms from the other side.
Only people asserting themselves, civil disobedience and revolution has ever worked throughout history as far as I can tell
But I'm just a memer what do I know
π―π―π―π―
As much as I'd like this to be true, and as much as I see this idea posted on many places, I think it's incorrect. This cycle will have magnitudes more impact on everything, including bitcoin.
Do you have concerns about trump concentrating the miners in usa, and colluding them into a 51% attack? Much as I love my stack getting pumped, I wouldn't have been heartbroken in the event of harris presidency. This may be an unpopular opinion (and I'm open to discussion on this!) but btc hostile regimes would break and scatter the miners, which would strengthen the resillience of the network long term.
Any thoughts on this?