Lab leak is now the leading theory. We who payed attention knew this in 2020.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/covid-origin-china-lab-leak-807b7b0a
Lab leak is now the leading theory. We who payed attention knew this in 2020.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/covid-origin-china-lab-leak-807b7b0a
Let's not forget how our voices were silenced when we spoke about this. Every one of us was censored for sharing this information. But not anymore #Nostr
#[0]
Donโt believe everything you read on the news :) no one can know for sure the facts about this.
The issue at hand is not the veracity of the information, but rather the right of individuals to openly discuss it without fear of censorship or suppression.
There's enough smoking gun evidence for it. The wet market theory, not so much.
Matt Ridley wrote a book titled โViralโ that goes into this
Have not read it yet but on my list
We knew it and they censored it as hard as possible. Why is it in the msm now? What will happen when the world begin to demand reparations from China for this? A possible path to a bigger conflict.
I didn't know it for a fact (the lockdown, mask, and vaccine rabbit holes were time consuming enough), but I was 70% certain lab leak was the case by then.
Yes and it makes the jibby jab a bio-weapon.
Caught them all
All of you plebs who spoke about it already in 2020 and never caved in, in spite of threats and bullying from big corporations, mainstream press and the governments, you my people ๐ซ
Anyone gotca link to archive or non paywall?
Canโt read can you share a copy?
Thank you
If only there was any proper evidence to support it. But I get why the culprits behind the virology hoax would love for the theory that there is a dangerous lab leaked virus to spread.
Nice troll.
Should've done your research.
https://nakadai.substack.com/p/gain-of-function-the-evidence
I appreciate where you are coming from when you write โQuestion everything you hear. Donโt take anyoneโs word for anything without actual proof; real evidence. Donโt let anyone hide the facts & evidence from you.โ
But how can you right after that go on and take at face value conclusions of a clearly rigged scientific paper, which does not provide any proper evidence of the virus existing? You just blindly accept it and then go on to discuss in detail meaningless similarities and differences in some theoretical computer generated genomic sequences.
Text leak of lab leak