Avatar
Michaël Roerade
e87c737b6c73d9c2c3c4fad3fdd801b98e359ef0b150d43ed5531d3dcc2c0e54
Bitcoin | ENTP | Freedom & Privacy maximalist | My opinions

I heard it (also) has something to do with the memory of the Weimar Republic hyperinflation still being relatively vivid, with stories being passed on from previous generations.

On a long enough timescale, "risk-free rate" will turn out to be a buzz word from the fiat era.

Study #Praxeology & #AustrianEconomics to understand why.

https://m.primal.net/Kusa.mp4

All humans act with the goal to remove uneasiness for themselves. However, there is never a guarantee, that action will lead to the desired outcome.

This means everything people do implies risk. Even deciding to do nothing can be risky. Economic activity, saving and investing, are ALL downstream from this principle.

As Mises pointed out, every investment (in fact all human action) is speculative. Spending our time & energy is never guaranteed to lead to the outcome we anticipate or desire.

Since there is no way to remove this inherent risk, the only way to have something called a "risk-free interest rate", is to offload the downside risk to others.

As Saifedean points out, this is only possible by printing the money, or through bailouts when things go wrong.

In both cases, the "others" paying for the downside risk, are those who hold their value in fiat currency. The dilution of their value, is what finances providing "risk-free" returns to those who actually put capital at risk by investing it in government bonds.

I have a hard time believing Sayor doesn't understand this. If that were the case, he would try to argue against the points being made by Saifedean. Instead, he says: "You're going all maxi on me", claiming governments and the dollar aren't going anywhere.

I find it equally hard to believe Saylor doesn't understand the game theoretic probability of hyperbitcoinization.

You can't say everything is going to zero against #bitcoin, there is no second best, and at the same time claim the dollar will last forever.

As he eloquently explains at many occasions, inflation is caused by debasement of the money supply and bitcoin is the ideal form of property to protect your net worth against it.

However, history shows that on a long enough timescale, inflation transitions to hyperinflation, which is the collapse of people's trust in the currency.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/88/The_Hanke_Krus_Hyperinflation_Table.pdf

Saylor makes a distinction between property and currency, saying bitcoin is the best property, but the dollar will remain the dominant currency. However, as goes for the entire fiat-based monetary standard, this distinction is only kept in place by (the threat of) violence.

If you're not sure what that means, try printing your own money, not paying taxes or breaking legal tender laws and other financial regulations. You will soon find out that these privileges of states, governments and banks are protected by potential violence.

Without this threat, nobody would be using non-scarce pieces of paper and numbers in a very big Excel sheet, and exchange them for things that in fact require time & energy to produce. Yet here we are.

What is ironic, is that the inconsistencies in Saylor's reasoning, in part, boil down to fear of that same violence.

If he were to advocate for bitcoin replacing the US dollar as currency, there is a non-zero chance he would have to jump on his yacht and flee, McAffee-style.

The other explanation is more straightforward: Follow the money.

Saylor makes smart use of the fiat system to build a bitcoin stack that will most likely one day be of geopolitical significance. A game that clearly brings him fun and satisfaction (removal of uneasiness 😉).

Advocating for replacement of the dollar would put $MSTR stock in the bucket of non-investable assets for many of the institutions that buy it to get indirect exposure to bitcoin's asymmetric upside, which would in turn decrease Saylor's ability to attact more cheap capital.

I have immense respect for Saylor's guts, intellect, and ability to explain bitcoin from first principles, but he's clearly walking the tight-rope between two diametrically opposed systems.

Sooner or later, he will have to choose...

If you think smartphones leading to a generation of youngsters who can't do elementary mental calculation, can't read an analog clock and have the attention span of a goldfish was bad, wait until an entire generation has grown up using AI...

Besides simple personal values such as being caring, responsible and honest with loved ones, I changed my entire life and my views on practically EVERYTHING over the last 6-7 years.

The irony of calling the current paradigm "capitalism", while simultaneously quoting "Chancellor on the brink of second bailout" in bitcoin's genesis block, is lost on a lot of people.

No, it's the Onyx firmware. It used to work OK without GSF, which I could just let unchecked in settings. Never tried to flash another ROM to it

I know. I have an Onyx Boox 8 e-ink tablet, that until recently allowed not enabling GSF. Unfortunately, after the latest update, ik keeps giving a pop-up saying GSF is required when I open any app I installed on it through Aurora Store. 😤

GrapheneOS fixes this...

Replying to Avatar Svetski

This is probably an unpopular opinion…but let’s see..

Elon’s smartest move right now would actually be to ally with Zuck…

Hear me out…

An overwhelmingly large percentage of the Brazilian population literally LIVE on WhatsApp and IG. I’m not just talking their friends, and scrolling. I mean this is how almost EVERY business runs. They don’t have websites down here. They build their entire digital presences on those two apps.

If Zuckerberg’s transformation is real (dunno if I’m convinced, but who knows - crazier things have happened) and he allows for the kind of content X allowed to spread in Brazil, this Alexandre monkey would be STUCK.

There’s no WAY he could shut access to that down, without the entire country stopping. Literally nothing would work.

——-

This is a GREAT moment for Nostr, but we’ve still got a loooooong way to go before the network and the apps on it are robust.

In fact, similar to Wikileaks in the early days, we probably don’t want to draw too much attention right now to Nostr apps bc while the protocol itself is hard to censor, as was just seen, it’s very easy to censor an app.

Granted, it’s a bit like playing wackamole with Nostr, but once again, we’re not there yet. There probably needs to be 10x more *really good* apps, before we could even hope to sustain a forced shutdown in any country for that matter.

——-

Before anyone says “yeah but they’re only stopping themselves from getting on Nostr”

Duh…obviously. But these maniacs are also fucking over the very people who live in these countries and require some form of connectivity.

———

So anyway. Possibly an unpopular opinion, but I think this would be a very interesting strategic play.

And if you play out the scenario, there’s a good chance that idiot de Moraes here in Brazil ends up trapped between:

1. Having to allow X to operate again, or

2. trying to apply the same pressure to WhatsApp / IG

3. allowing IG/Whatsapp to spread uncensored info, and thus losing his ability to censor anyway

All three scenarios, he loses.

Curious to hear what a few people think on this.

nostr:npub1rtlqca8r6auyaw5n5h3l5422dm4sry5dzfee4696fqe8s6qgudks7djtfs nostr:npub1h8nk2346qezka5cpm8jjh3yl5j88pf4ly2ptu7s6uu55wcfqy0wq36rpev nostr:npub1guh5grefa7vkay4ps6udxg8lrqxg2kgr3qh9n4gduxut64nfxq0q9y6hjy nostr:npub1a2cww4kn9wqte4ry70vyfwqyqvpswksna27rtxd8vty6c74era8sdcw83a nostr:npub1az9xj85cmxv8e9j9y80lvqp97crsqdu2fpu3srwthd99qfu9qsgstam8y8 ??

It remains to be seen whether Elon is for real, long term...