Anonymous zapped ⚡️10,000 sats
nostr:note1n6c5hskksa0pfs4nkh7nt6m0tsj73rc8lsp5savyz3m72thsfpes4jm53j
The EU's latest mass-surveillance initiative Going Dark is taking aim at the Lightning Network, 'mixers' and self-custody in its latest encryption report, but still lacks fundamental data to back up its claims that more surveillance does equal more security.
The EU's apparent regulatory strategy of "we'll just say things and hope no one notices" now seems to continue to manifest in its evaluation of financial privacy services.
https://www.therage.co/eus-going-dark-takes-aim-at-self-custody-mixers-and-the-lightning-network/

Anonymous zapped ⚡️10,000 sats
nostr:note1n6c5hskksa0pfs4nkh7nt6m0tsj73rc8lsp5savyz3m72thsfpes4jm53j
Probably not the author manipulating Primal’s top-zapped trending feed…
lots of privacy people follow her so could definitely be legit. also, i felt like the content is worth boosting even though it could possibly be a self-zap. the nostr:npub18l3fyx3rtak2x2hnhqp50nyykszpycumff432kwtp3975qgnp7uq3qza55 content is manually curated by me with the help of a script i wrote that helps me find fat zaps to review.
also, nostr:npub12vkcxr0luzwp8e673v29eqjhrr7p9vqq8asav85swaepclllj09sylpugg doesn't display anon zaps on notes, so not sure if they even count anon zaps in it's trending feed algo.
Could be legit. When I replied with that I had glanced at the Primal most-zapped feed and that note was at the top, but if Primal doesn’t count anon zaps then probably just coincidental.