Saylor is a Statist, he has too much to lose

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

At a certain level, we all are.

I just need some reasoning other than crazy opinions. He’s been a net positive for BTC. That’s a fucking FACT.

What does Saylor have to gain?

POWER

satsmcd your nostr schtick is usually dumb sarcastic takes to razz people up is this another one? or this something you actually believe

You know me. I have zero idea who the fuck you are. And don’t really care. Tbh.

Go……….fuck………yourself. Directly in your own face.

Bitcoin is for enemies. No gatekeepers here

You’ve clearly never been to a conference 😂

Nope. Keep on stroking your egos

Just because you aren’t around them doesn’t mean they don’t exist.

I prefer to know the enemy than pretend they don’t exist.

The only thing that’s sus about saylor is him not embracing bitcoin as a medium of exchange

Gold or real estate aren’t MOE either.

He’s saying yet. It could be. Could, not should or will be.

For our lifetime & the next you’re better off dealing in the reality of Digital Real Estate or Gold with the ability to borrow against it while converting the the local currency of where you live.

Saylor is losing the plot

It’s Peer to peer digital cash

Not

Peer to peer digital gold

And not

Peer to peer digital real estate

The plot is there is no plot. Bitcoin doesn't give a fuck, use it however you want to.

Just don't infringe on mine or anyone else's right to use it how we want to.

Man, what a day.

🍿

The reasoning is he was a CEO of a publicly traded company. He had a fiduciary responsibility to the shareholders to make sure his fiat federal reserve notes didn't melt away to inflation.

If he thinks ossification is the way to continue to deliver shareholder value he is going to promote that...because he has to.

I'm not defending that, I'm just stating a fact.

Sure, with illegal, behind the scenes, manipulation tactics dealing directly with public ETF’s?

Are people fucking retarded?