lol no, cuz if a lot of people agree that it’s important to try to be an independent thinker, it’s not just static, the next thing to do then is for each person to try to do that. it’s more like encouragement.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

You’re basically just removing the idea of consensus from the person I originally replied to. Which I’m fine with. And also the thing that I was poking fun at about that comment.

yes I know. I was pointing out the logical loophole that makes your comment seem true and paradoxical. and that’s why I wrote ā€˜lol’, cuz I realize you’re being a little bit funny.

oh wait … I didn’t ā€œremove the idea of consensusā€ from your response comment. šŸ˜‘Consensus = agreement. I’m saying, they agree and have consensus on the shared values, then continue to try at being their own individual thinkers.