Reminder:
Discussion
I've had that thought as well.
Saylor is a state actor.
I’ve raised my 5% to 25% and believe that’s probably right. It was always inevitable anyway.
Seems likely
That would make an interesting question of who is leading the dance? Saylor learns bitcoin, convinces government they need bitcoin, and says here is what I can do for you. Or, government knows they need bitcoin, educates Saylor, and says here’s what you need to do for us. 🤔
If you were the USG and wanted to build a material bitcoin position with the following constraints, how would you do it?
Who wrote this? Just curious, I mostly agree. MSTR will become a stable coin issuing bitcoin backed bank and too big to fail and the government will nationalize it. Mandibles then bitcoin standard.