Replying to Avatar jb55

i don't see why in principle advancements in quantum error correction won't eventually allow us to scale to large numbers of logical qubits.

dismissive bitcoiners are relying on huge doses of "i hope it remains a hard problem".

nostr:note1pfg8nfazrv3h8spfm87yrhg4j9mc9gr6n67ldz6508m7u5p73jase9zg45
Avatar
π•Ύπ–Šπ–— π•Ύπ–‘π–Šπ–Šπ–•π–ž 2w ago πŸ’¬ 1

It’s not like Bitcoin is static software frozen in time, i say it will adapt faster than quantum can realistically endanger it..

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Jameson Lopp 2w ago πŸ’¬ 1

The ossifiers will actively seek to prevent that.

Avatar
π•Ύπ–Šπ–— π•Ύπ–‘π–Šπ–Šπ–•π–ž 2w ago

Even when the risk is essential? Don’t they usually resist unnecessary change.. this would be some survival-level change right? Once there’s evidence the discussions can start to take place idk