Replying to Avatar Laeserin

I was originally thinking that I would just only rate things that I can simply address with an e or a tag, I'd include that tag, and that's all.

But everyone else is using a d tag that contains all possible identifiers and addresses for everything in existence, including other tags, nested within the d tag. Like, a d-tag with i-tags and e-tags and a-tags in it. And I find that confusing.
Avatar
Captain's Nostr Log 8mo ago

to me this feels like a namespace problem, and perhaps the wiki style events can provide a namespace for things that don't have their own identifier

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Laeserin 8mo ago

It's both a namespace problem and the question of whether it isn't better to use different tags to describe different things, outright, instead of nesting the different tags in a d-tag, just so that you can pretend that they're all using the same identifier.

Avatar
Captain's Nostr Log 8mo ago

also, if you have your own event kind that doesn't clash with existing kinds, I think it's fine to define the semantics for let's say the o-tag to be whatever you want it to be