We should remove calories from food labels. There needs to be more of a focus on ingredients than calories.

Unpopular opinion?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Sounds like anti-intellectual bullshit

👎

I like how you're thinking. 🤔

How about we also remove like 90% of the ingredients? At least in American foods 😅

If the ingredient list on peanut butter only reads, "peanuts", people will actually read it.

There's a Swedish cracker brand, Wasa, that is sold in America, and it actually only has like 3-4 ingredients in it, which is great!

I couldn't agree more!

If it has a lot of ingredients and most of them are hieroglyphics, I'm avoiding it most of the time.

Here's what I think would happen if this was done:

1. Shift from Quantity to Quality

People would be more likely to assess food based on what's in it rather than how much energy it has.

2. Highly-processed food loses some of its pull.

No more "low calorie" or "guilt-free" language on junk food.

3. Unintended Consequences

- Could increase overconsumption of food

- Could trigger new forms of eating disorders

- Junk food companies would find ways to obfuscate bad ingredients or make them look healthier than they are (i. e. natural flavors)

Since I've never looked at calories (even when I cut a TON of weight for wrestling), I don't see much use in them.

Removing them would do more good than bad IMO, but a shift like that would require more education.

nostr:note1gz2lq98z2hd0qg4lval847ze9pwcg3glj9z7ztk0rf53c6emgzcqhqcccj