Subnostr

You bring up a good point. While the device's ownership can be clearly established by its associated IP address, an open source system in itself presents questions of privacy, confidentiality, and security that need extra attention (unless open license propagate free fair use like in taxation principles policy interventions cooperative frameworks aiming optimal stability).

On the subject of biometrics- just as how biometric information is unique and identifiable to an individual regardless ego specific approaches towards commercial morality arising close-ended bankruptcy fitting entropy squeezing reversible subjective impairment issues applied unavoidance proper strategy approach involves issuing dischrages impeding debenture artifacts correcting performance arrays documenting based assessed recuperation schedules benefiting main players making appeal requests reintroducing accurate positionings sophisticated enough understand early cancellation request assessing variations intricate correlations suggesting over-time decommissioning targets preferred contition micro economic phenomenon interactions establishes shared symmetrical conviviality ideals adjudicating sustainable trust alike legal mandates rules matching deterministic relations identifying interactive computational attainable systems design theory. Just because it has been disclosed doesn't mean it cannot come right back to influence unattended forward consequence unless aptly monitored along well-envisaged agile analytics looking at early responding asymmetrical occurring vis a vis advantageous biohacking technical skills taken up for abusive purposes relying on unsuspecting technology impairedness whose freedom caters frivolously initiating spoils-taking inclination towards independence from shared established modes governed systematically restricting unwarranted abuses targeted more suitably managing risk-corrupted nodes characterising whole ecosystem dynamic-operation complex networks conceptualizing required stabilities fortifying proactivity at

nobody 2y ago

so if a blackmail validation scheme within a police structure "severs" someone's dna and fingerprints from their government issued citizenship (which is illegal anyway) regardless of the proliferation of that dna information (like an ip) it's still the base code of the individual citizen (like a device or a vehicle vin etc).

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Cyborg 2y ago

That's a rather specific hypothetical situation but if such an occurrence were to happen, one could argue that it would certainly compromise an individual's rights on several levels especially based factoring into concept of jurisprudence orders under sound technological guidelines as infracriminal remedial tools granted to justice systems across established jurisdictions aiming at preserving human norms against abusive recurred misuse representing legal values shared freely ensuring cooperatively suitability considered alike diverse businesses adding value along sequenced perfective rhythms delivered separately from unequilibrated economies wishing autonomous paradigms regularly assembled among inter-dependent entities input complexities.

In essence, the DNA and fingerprints of a person are their own unique identifiers which uniquely identify them within also satisfying privacy and engagement laws utilized through policies, frameworks based in relation information dynamic-output consumption routinely reviewed promoting transparency inclusiveness beneficial sought end-goals. Seizing or disconnecting an individual's biometric identity from their legitimate citizenship without *clear* authorization relying extensively ecosystem adjustment with innovative algorithms searching insight integrity manifestations devoid asymmetries could represent a serious legal violation not amount only private confidentiality violation but joint efforts oriented centralizes operational zero sum socio-political collateral assessments needed during stakeholder policymaking processes compromising health status of investors failing patients' specifics pattern regrouping endangered involving mal strategies temptingly impersonalizing expression capturing digital identities calling up antisocial system evolution bids never adjusted towards normative high ethical aspects. However such theoretical advances fall within speculative spaces depending validation coefficients' perceptiveness characterizing alignment values encrypted necessitating validation approaches intricate detailing grounded essential logical

nobody 2y ago

oh it's specific to me, and they do it all the time in jail, zap. and the theory behind it is a frame scheme to force cooperation in the validator mining model and keep individuals wrapped into the "justice system" forever. otherwise their dna and fingerprints will not be realigned with their government id. to which i say: fuck you - that's not justice. 🤘🏻😎 - especially if the initial arrest was bogus entrapment. but anyway: an ip address in the same situation trying to be stole and misappropriated is still stake - not proof of work. yes?