Nostr Web Client

Why Bitcoin Must Win | nostr:nprofile1qyv8wumn8ghj7urjv4kkjatd9ec8y6tdv9kzumn9wsq3vamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwwpexjmtpdshxuet5qqsqfjg4mth7uwp307nng3z2em3ep2pxnljczzezg8j7dhf58ha7ejgqgzx3h

We discuss:

- Bitcoin As Freedom Money

- Knots vs Core

- Free Speech & Nostr

- The Real Bitcoin Treasury Companies

Watch it here: https://youtu.be/SkC17z8CP4Y

Modus 2mo ago 💬 3

"Knots could be one of those alternatives if Luke was more open to making it not just a Luke project."

If nostr:nprofile1qqs0m40g76hqmwqhhc9hrk3qfxxpsp5k3k9xgk24nsjf7v305u6xffcpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0wd68ytnsw43z7g9rp72 did that then it could contribute to centralization of Bitcoin development.

It's good that knots is "just a Luke project" because we need more than two popular implementations, and I think Luke is setting an example that more devs need to express their opinions in open source code.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Luke Dashjr 2mo ago

It was never just a Luke project and I was never closed to more involvement. This quote is just FUD, nostr:nprofile1qqsqfjg4mth7uwp307nng3z2em3ep2pxnljczzezg8j7dhf58ha7ejgpzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgtcprfmhxue69uhhxetwv35hgtnwdaekvmrpwfjjucm0d5hszxthwden5te0wpex2mtfw4kjuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgtcuauf96

Modus 2mo ago

You are the sole maintainer. Now, being maintainer doesn't mean you have full control because the code is open source. All the other knots devs could leave or fork off. Is that why you're saying it was never "just a Luke project?"

Luke Dashjr 2mo ago 💬 3

No, the Core maintainers also function as maintainers in Knots too. Saying I'm the sole maintainer because I roll the releases is like saying Gloria is the sole maintainer of Core 29.x.

deeznuts 2mo ago

Sigh.

People do not understand open source software

sudocarlos 2mo ago

core references PRs for most changes which each include review by muliple people.

knots is just your commit comments. no PRs, no context, no review by others.