Now I can get on board with that. They need a "nicotine warning" stating potential tax ramifications, especially if the goal is to onboard plebs who are brand new to this. And/or really iron out the details up front and not bury them, intentionally or not.
Discussion
Yeah, so somewhere in there earlier I was trying to make the point to the arguebot that the folks with the platforms would be a great avenue for this. Talk about the features, pros, cons, etc. and mention the tax liability. Ultimately we want people having a good experience, not calling it a scam. And they will when they get that tax bill, even if it is technically their own fault. Seems easier to educate them up front and explain the personal responsibility of it. But I don't see that much, hence me getting all pissy about it. 😆
Don't quote me, but I think nostr:npub1cn4t4cd78nm900qc2hhqte5aa8c9njm6qkfzw95tszufwcwtcnsq7g3vle discussed this whole topic, inluding tax ramifications, with nostr:npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx on the #MoneyMatters episode they did together mid-December. However, I do acknowledge that it's somewhat unreasonble to presume somebody would jump into all the podcasts and do deep dives on their first day in bitcoin.
Yep, I think the new feature sell just kind of outpaces the broader education for noobs. Same with Nostr development. I'm the guy who talks everybody into stuff, so I end up doing a lot of onboarding. It's tough.