Dear #[0],

I believe we are at an impasse, for you have decided to use my Zap Signature⚡️✍️ of 1234 Sats™️ on a post #[1] by #[2]. Just like an inscription on everyone’s copy of the Bitcoin blockchain, I have direct ownership of this Zap Signature and no one can forge it via the sending of 1234 Satoshis. It’s on my profile bio, therefore the ‘Law of Dibs’ is in effect. In what good nature do you make of this injustice? What say you, good sir, what say you?

?cid=2154d3d73v23yilpl97k1hn1zyt8xiwsmlp8paj94jzwvrpb&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Dear MAB,

I'm afraid we've become the victims of a terrible case of coincidence. I was unaware of your dibs decree, and will cease all encroachment on your intellectual property this very instant. I apologize profusely, and will be switching to a zap signature of 1,220 satoshis as a mark of my date of birth 12/20. Wishing you an excellent evening sire, and may the zaps serve you ever well.

with regards,

Gabe

Dear #[2],

Ahh, good sir, you are quite noble. For your troubles and out of good faith, you shall see a incoming transaction with my ⚡️✍️ amount. Please, I urge you to spend them wisely by zapping another Pleb on a #V4V worthy post or to stack these sats humbly so that future you will thank the present you. This encounter has had a turn of events that I am much appreciative for. Such is the way for Bitcoiners. In order to enact the ‘Law of Dibs’ for your ⚡️✍️ of 1220, I would advise placing it in your bio. Well, I do bid you adieu on this very pleasant night.

Sincerely,

#[6]