Not sure why you say tied up? It’s still fully self-custodial. You can close a channel at any moment, there is no lock up at all.

It’s simply how decentralization works. Same reason we want multiple nodes and multiple miners on the base layer. Multiple nodes and multiple channels per node is what makes LN decentralized and amazingly robust! Any one node on the network can go down and I can still transact flawlessly.

If someone is relying on a single channel and complaining when it goes down, it’s not a fault of the network itself.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

What if someone can only afford a single channel?

Who TF can afford to have multiple big channels these days? Not I. Also, every channel open is another risk vector to manage.

I mean if you are transacting with less then 100k sats custodial LN is perfectly fine and in fact preferable imo. But that’s another discussion lol. 😆