The comment is not at all hard to understand in context.
How many idiots do you think you’ll need to auto update? 10% 20% ?
I wonder what percent v30 will get.
Discussion
I must be slow. I'm asking about your claim that
"this default policy change- which will lead to increased spam in blocks"
I would like specifics, because I don't agree, but I would like to know where we differ.
Here’s a better question for your Marxist technocrat games:
What makes this real world test on BSV inconclusive or invalid for Bitcoin?
The Core propaganda line goes like this:
They don't know how spam will be increased with the change from 80 Bytes to 100 KB.
They don't know what is spam.
They don't know what is Bitcoin.
And they don't know what is The Internet
Yes, and look at no response from the technocrat. Can’t even address the actual complete case study on BSV.
Nothing unexpected. Wonder if he can address the root cause of all this which is Citrea. But it doesn't actually matter. We can run Bitcoin Knots.
Nope they just launch into paragraphs of Marxist redefinition technocrat babble instead.
Yes, and we’ll see how the reception of v30 goes. Defaults matter.
Sad but true.
Yet that behaviour has a root cause too. I wonder what are the incentives for it? (its a rhetoric question)
The incentive at the root of evil is to destroy and twist what is beautiful and good, because the evil side cannot create things like the good side can.
You see this with Marxism, they build ugly buildings, break apart families, only loyalty to the state is allowed, no pleasure even. Nothing of the GOOD that God intended for people. They also change the meaning of words to accomplish their goals.
It’s a framework of humanity explained in the Bible, the devil rebels from God out of frustration, pride, and envy. The devil then starts twisting God’s creation into things that the devil claims as is own. The devil tries to make the things as ugly and terrible as possible so that God will not take them back or forgive them. (God wins in the end because Christ sacrificed himself for the ugliest and most terrible anyway.)
I’m not sure of the secular analogy.
To me I don’t see another way these core devs could be so flippant, dismissive, and arrogant about the most important software project on earth, with very little sense of humility or stewardship.
Either way- many are not consciously doing harm, the truth will wake them up sooner or later.
Just reminded me of this: