Nostr Web Client

He's correct, nostr doesn't fix CEOs getting arrested. But his point is also moot because targeting CEOs of nostr apps, even of big ones, will never have the disruptive return for governments that the arrest of a centralized platform's CEO has, mostly because switching costs are close to zero for nostr users, while there is no switching option for telegram users.

I Stack UTXOs 1y ago

he's not correct because arresting nostr app CEOs is irrelevant. The value is in the nostr network and governments will not go after the app CEOs because you can plug in another app and reduce the efforts of governments to garbage. So governments will not even attempt going after a CEO of some app with 50,000 users.

I just don't understand your point and also Parker Lewis clearly doesn't understand the value proposition of nostr.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

El Flaco 1y ago

I think we mainly agree. Nostr CEOs are lower value targets compared to platform CEOs. But govs could still come after them for ✨️ reasons.

It's silly to expect a protocol to fix arbitrary arrests.