nostr:note1e9ckeju6t5scyef4ssxt7plwqhwh3d803fmj46nc537sq2nz5umqwaxwga
"X will allow more shitcoining" is an emotional kneejerk reaction, not a logical argument against X.
Discussion
I'm on team nostr:nprofile1qy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uq32amnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwv3sk6atn9e5k7tcqyp60l3gucvq4pnmekm9nzmf6zh8nx24jngu0aj0tfp9tz4gad5v9vczalyt , have you listened to his interview with McCormack? https://fountain.fm/episode/74OSUUbvxqUqBp4VGrDi
I have not listened to this episode but will.
After listening to this I felt pretty ambivalent toward OP_CAT. Seems like it is a pretty conservative step forward and anything less is just nothing at all. But I'm no core dev. /shrug
https://open.spotify.com/episode/745hp9L2L7So9i9B3neDHB?si=PbayJxz-QyyEWt51qopQkw
I don't have an opinion about OP_CAT, I just like his philosophy that bitcoin isn't just a set of undirected affordances that are defined by what people use it for