It’s been about five years now since Swan Bitcoin opened their doors and started doing business.

In addition to successes, they ran into various frictions and controversies during that time due to limitations at their counter parties that they had to work through and upscale from, but at the end of the day, they have promoted self custody from the start, still do, and people can withdraw their sats safe and sound. They want you to, and you should, ideally.

Their vision from founding was that sats probably shouldn’t be on the balance sheet liability side of a startup (them) and instead should be in qualified custodians held in buyers’ names, to the extent that they’re not self custodied. They made it free to pull sats into self custody from the start and have a really high ratio of buyers pulling into self custody.

Cheers to them for being five years in operation and still working for their users.

When people are like “You should pull sats from Swan due to headline XYZ” Swan is like “headline XYZ is mostly wrong, here’s why, but yes you should pull sats from us, which we’ve been saying from the start!”

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Swan derangement syndrome is strong

Poorly managed company.

They presented well for years but their story is cringeworthy now

nostr:nprofile1qqsqfjg4mth7uwp307nng3z2em3ep2pxnljczzezg8j7dhf58ha7ejgprpmhxue69uhhqun9d45h2mfwwpexjmtpdshxuet5qyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnswf5k6ctv9ehx2aqpr9mhxue69uhhxetwv35hgtnwdaekvmrpwfjjucm0d5klqft7 in shambles

I am not a paid spokesman. But, Swan was one of the first places where I bought BTC. I am still a customer and withdrawing is easy, free, and painless. They have had some bad press, but it just hasn’t affect their customer service for my small account. Maybe others have had different experiences.

Pulled my business with them years ago. Their custodian issues years concerned the shit out of me.

Too much drama and dubious leadership and past shadiness at those custodians as well.

I simply felt I couldn’t trust them.

I’ve been told that more than once but never moved any sats. Still dca with them every week.

Sorry to be repetitive, but I think you will find it empowering to actually own the Bitcoin you ‘own’.

I like Swan. I love River and Strike.

Founded on a sound ethos. True to core principle of bitcoin

How can one get a job at Swan?

Become their next trust company.

Thank you for this, Lynn. I sent all of my recently orange-pilled friends to Swan, and did have some concerns, recently. I needed this perspective.

Dunno Lyn.

The amount of drama and missteps are quite problematic. Do I hear any of this drama from River or Fold who just IPOed via SPAC? Either Cory has had bad luck after bad luck or there is a level of incompetence that is troubling.

Just an example. Swan decided to use Fortress Trust which failed. It was ran by this individual https://www.denverpost.com/2008/01/07/swinging-from-one-net-conquest-to-another/

BTC is an extremely unique and hard asset thrusting itself into the limelight of traditional finance. It experiences long, powerful bull markets, followed by debilitating and painful refractory periods—leaving many participants drained and suffering through years of deflationary, life sucking prices. If you're a centralized custodian, a certain level of seriousness is required, as you can’t just print your way out of a blown-out hole.

Personal life not withstanding, it does not bolster confidence that Swan would choose a custodian ran by a man who's experience consists of running a singers webpage , performing in a swingers cornhub video and a disastrous failed at first attempt with Prime Trust.

All of this found with a 10sec google/brave search. I suspect others like River saw the debauchery in the industry and decided to build their own infrastructure.

I switched to River and Unchained after Swan failed re: trust companies 2x. Second time cost me and family members some money.