Dude, the burden of proof for obscure side effects is on you.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No it isn't. The burden of proof is absolutely on the maker of the drug demanding it be injected into every single child in the US or world.

And they have *not* done that. To the contrary, they have spent decades doing everything they can to avoid highly specific and robust data on it. That alone should be a horribly bright red flag.

Again, feel free to take all the time you like, and find me a clinical trial, placebo controlled, that studies the side effects of aluminum hydroxide or the other adjuvants. Just go find one.

The burden of proof is *always* on the person who demands intervention and makes the *explicit* claim that it is perfectly safe.

There isn’t one. Period.