Replying to Avatar djsumdog

I’m not saying it does. In fact it doesn’t. That’s the problem. The blog post I wrote/linked is about how I would change Section 230. My issue is that it currently doesn’t say anything about editorializing.
Avatar
Matt Hamilton [Maryland] 2y ago

nostr:npub109x0x9dlft64y4h9vz9mxu92qpqn752sd8p4xe2zkcanlzmk2fcq3pwvvl nostr:npub1y7urda0puhzwr8rsw9vs7fclzk9c8fhc5zhpc8y2kyr68g9z4axqynagv7 nostr:npub108zt8c43ulvdwnax2txurhhr07wdprl0msf608udz9rvpd5l68ascvdkr5 nostr:npub1znavx0efn9y7a9tjux6pchjdurmw2e84fxwxflmauupjz0558x0sqmwtpl oh, my mistake. I read your first sentence as "Section 230 **doesn't** allow for editorializing".

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.