So we all know now not to trust nostr:nprofile1qqs0wgf8etnayvkcs4c636fdvepy73jc9q2xlcln64srjdm5e98p8ncpxfmhxue69uhkcmnzd968xtnsv9cx2unnv968xtnfduhkummnw3exxmrfv4h8gtmpwp5j7a339aex2mrp0yq3qamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wd3skueqpmn9xd because we all fucking know that crashing planes into buildings does not cause controlled demolitions like what we seen on 9/11.

And I'm old enough to remember we didn't have AI generated movies back then, I've seen the footage myself.

The explosions moving down the buildings.

Building 7 wasn't even hit by a plane for fuck sake.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

My dude, those towers burnt for well over an hour. The first plane hit just after 8 and the towers first fell at like 9:30.

So, you tell me how long structural steel will last with a full tank, let alone the top half cascading down.

Even Osama didn't expect that.

It's literally just physics.

The conspiracy is whether or not people knew about it (I E. Mossad knew and played their advantage)

But it did happen. The towers falling was because of shitty engineering who never thought about it.

As mentioned Osama didn't expect them to fall and actually just wanted to crash two planes into the highest buildings in central NYC in regards to Palestine.

He said the towers falling brought a curse to the middle east which he did not intend.

Funny how no other steel reinforced building has ever fallen this way.

From another AI:

Other high-rise building fires, even those that have burned more intensely or for longer durations, have not resulted in total structural collapse. For example, the 1991 fire at One Meridian Plaza in Philadelphia burned for 19 hours across eight floors, yet the building remained standing.

Similarly, the 2008 fire at the Windsor Tower in Madrid burned for 20 hours and caused significant damage, but only partial collapse occurred.

Therefore, while jet fuel can weaken steel structures under extreme and specific conditions, such as those on 9/11, it has not led to the collapse of any other steel-reinforced buildings in recorded history

Then of course there's building 7. I think there's even video of obvioue explosions going up/down that building prior to its collapse.

I didn't find out about building 7 many years afterwards because during that time Facebook wasn't invented and many other websites weren't invented, the internet wasn't that popular so the only place to get information was through MSM on the TV. So of course the TV MSM would never talk about that.

yes. There's a video on youtube of a journalist that goes right up to the building 7 after the event. They demolished these buildings. One of the WTC buildings were set to be demolished and had no staff or office equipment in it. In fact they invited the media to come an film it. This is a time line over an entire month that you conflate with happening on the same day.

I'll look for that youtube video now

sorry, i should add that the journalist says they are demolishing it because half the building has already collapsed. You need to watch that clip. it's important historical context.

I'm trying to find it but there's so much nonsense. I actually watched it recently again. It's raw footage of the cameraman and the new reporter and they are literally on the street below and there's like burnt out cars and fire trucks and stuff. It's the same journalist that reports that building 7 is going to collapse, and that everyone has been evacuated and that there's a perimeter etc. then the scene changes to a far shot and he explains that building 7, which can't be seen from the angle they show, is colllapsing on one side and is marked for demolishing.

It's an important video that dispels a lot of nonsense.

9/11 was just a well executed plan during a time when it was still possible to do so. I firmly believe that it was funded by the Qatari's and was a means to cause shift in the middle east, but intelligence agencies knew about this whole thing, but let it happen because in what ever way, they would benefit (higher budgets, survillence rights, being able to do shady shit in the name of "hunting terrorists")

it's exactly how October 7th was ALLOWED to happen, even though Interpol etc. informed Israel month prior and Egypt warned them two weeks before. Israel however, let it happened then amplified the attacks on the Nova Festival to justify war, now with the last of the trio, Iran.

yes, but all these building are not the same size as WTC 1 and 2. Also the building itself is not designed in that way with exterior walls, it's floors are held to the frame of the building with several rivets, the core of the tower is the actual strongest part. You need to watch the numerous engineering documentaries on this.

Added to that, depending on where the planes hit, it also had about 20 to 50 floors above it. So with basic physics, it's like a jenga tower.

Even if you look at the most recent India air crash last month, the building still stood quite firm. The height + gravity is what made it collapse that way.

BTW there's nothing crazy about these guys flying planes into buildings. Throughout the 90's they realised they could and have done it. I think 9/11 was greater than it would have been, given that the towers did end up falling completely, and what made it more visceral was that by the time it came down, almost everyone was watching.

I think we we agree on a lot here. I'm still in the controlled demo camp though.

Mossad ran 9/11 Arab "hijacker" terrorist operation

By Wayne Madsen

https://www.ord.io/72990614