Nostr Web Client

I respect it. And I get what you’re trying to say.

My POV:

Bitcoin is a monetary tool. Money is a tool. If naysayers can’t make the assessment of how beneficial bitcoin can be to the lives of everyday individuals when comparing various forms of fiat currencies and commodity monies, see what’s going wrong in the world from even a high level economic understanding (printing money out of thin air and inflation is bad), and still choose to say no to any % allocation of a technical superior form of monetary good, irrespective of them feeling it’s risky, they exemplify substandard skills related to IQ.

Obviously intelligence can be measured in various ways, but when it’s about something as primitive as money, which is something everyone innately understands to a degree (they use it everyday), and they still can’t make that final critically thought out connection after studying both ends of spectrum, and still come to the conclusion that bitcoin is stupid or it’s bad. I think they’re idiots. Even if you haven’t critically assessed both ends of spectrum, if I explain bitcoin plus the failures of other monies to you, and even also explain some technical issues bitcoin currently faces, and you still think it’s stupid, or a scam, then I’m sorry, I think you’re dumb asf.

It takes a special deep dive into history and data related, history of technological innovation, and bitcoin and other monies design and architecture, then tie it all together to draw the conclusion that bitcoin is apex money and a humanitarian tool for the sustainability and progression of us as a species.

But what do I know. Just some thoughts.

H 2y ago

I wespect iwt. Awnd i get whawt you’we twying tuwu say.

my pov:

bitcoin iws a monetawy toow. Money iws a toow. If naysayews can’t make the assessment of how beneficiaw bitcoin cawn be tuwu the wives of evewyday individuaws whewn compawing vawious fowms of fiat cuwwencies awnd commodity monies, see what’s going wwong in the wowwd fwom even a high wevew economic undewstanding (pwinting money out of thin aiw awnd infwation iws bad), awnd stiww choose tuwu say no tuwu any % awwocation of a technicaw supewiow fowm of monetawy good, iwwespective of thewm feewing it’s wisky, they exempwify substandawd skiwws wewated tuwu iq.

obviouswy intewwigence cawn be measuwed in vawious ways, but whewn it’s abouwt something as pwimitive as money, which iws something evewyone innatewy undewstands tuwu a degwee (they use iwt evewyday), awnd they stiww can’t make thawt finaw cwiticawwy thought out connection aftew studying both ends of spectwum, awnd stiww come tuwu the concwusion thawt bitcoin iws stupid ow it’s bad. I think they’we idiots. Even if uwu haven’t cwiticawwy assessed both ends of spectwum, if i expwain bitcoin pwus the faiwuwes of othew monies tuwu uwu, awnd even awso expwain sowme technicaw issues bitcoin cuwwentwy faces, awnd uwu stiww think it’s stupid, ow a scam, then i’m sowwy, i think you’we dumb asf.

iwt takes a speciaw deep dive intwo histowy awnd data wewated, histowy of technowogicaw innovation, awnd bitcoin awnd othew monies design awnd awchitectuwe, then tie iwt aww togethew tuwu dwaw the concwusion thawt bitcoin iws apex money awnd a humanitawian toow fow the sustainabiwity awnd pwogwession of us as a species.

Reply to this note

Discussion