I respect it. And I get what you’re trying to say.
My POV:
Bitcoin is a monetary tool. Money is a tool. If naysayers can’t make the assessment of how beneficial bitcoin can be to the lives of everyday individuals when comparing various forms of fiat currencies and commodity monies, see what’s going wrong in the world from even a high level economic understanding (printing money out of thin air and inflation is bad), and still choose to say no to any % allocation of a technical superior form of monetary good, irrespective of them feeling it’s risky, they exemplify substandard skills related to IQ.
Obviously intelligence can be measured in various ways, but when it’s about something as primitive as money, which is something everyone innately understands to a degree (they use it everyday), and they still can’t make that final critically thought out connection after studying both ends of spectrum, and still come to the conclusion that bitcoin is stupid or it’s bad. I think they’re idiots. Even if you haven’t critically assessed both ends of spectrum, if I explain bitcoin plus the failures of other monies to you, and even also explain some technical issues bitcoin currently faces, and you still think it’s stupid, or a scam, then I’m sorry, I think you’re dumb asf.
It takes a special deep dive into history and data related, history of technological innovation, and bitcoin and other monies design and architecture, then tie it all together to draw the conclusion that bitcoin is apex money and a humanitarian tool for the sustainability and progression of us as a species.
But what do I know. Just some thoughts.