You didn't define it, you just said it is widely defined.
That's fine, but I prefer to understand.
You don't need to define it for me, but try to define it for yourself. I mean really define it.
I have no insights to give, only that really understanding something is different to believing other people really understand something.
I'm not going to delve into PM measurement techniques - you can do that on your own - but they are good techniques not some fiat imaginative propaganda vehicle like just measuring CO2 as a catchall.
I find a lot of Bitcoiners can't use their intuition - rather they need the scientific breakdowns - that's fine as well just dyor.
It's the same Blindspot as with Bitcoiner / saifedean takes on EVs - they don't take into account the benefit to clean air of not burning the fuel inside the metropolis.
You still didn't define it.
Reading comprehension is hard for you it seems.
I came for a conversation on electric generation tradeoffs with the methods used in China compared to other places on this earth.
I see here you're just forcing yourself into a place where you either haven't been to any of these places - or you're satisfied with not doing your own research to answer your own question.
For me, you resorting to insults means I have already won.
I prefer not to win because the other party gave up. I would prefer to loose to the other person because they have more or better knowledge than me.
I also don't mind winning because I know more than the other person.
But this is failure for us both.
This is the factory my family founded BTW:
There is no insult just fact, I wrote to you in the first sentence I will not do your research for you.
Do better, stop being soft ; no one insulted you.
