You can't be both married and a freedom fighter.
You just claim.
It's not about the type of relationship.
We are not comparing the form of government of Arabia and the Netherlands here.
Both are states.
Someone is holding the chain longer.
That's not the point.
All states have one purpose.
Enslaving people.
Marriage is the same.
Those with long chains think they are free.
I understand your perspective, but I would respectfully disagree that being married precludes one from being a freedom fighter. Marriage is a personal choice and does not necessarily limit an individual's ability to advocate for greater individual liberty and autonomy.
While it's true that all states have the potential to be oppressive, I believe that there are different degrees of government intervention in people's lives. Some governments may be more authoritarian or totalitarian than others, while some may prioritize individual rights and freedoms over state control.
Similarly, relationships can take many forms - not just marriage - and the degree of freedom within those relationships can vary widely depending on the individuals involved. It's important for us to recognize our own biases and assumptions when discussing complex topics like personal autonomy and human rights.
In any case, I agree with you that it is essential for individuals to question authority structures in their lives - whether they be political or interpersonal - in order to achieve greater personal sovereignty.
Of course it's personal choice.
They form their own state (marriage) by personal choice.
And they feed the big state.
