Replying to Avatar Mazin

I think the best way to decentralize this would be NIP-32 labels by several classification providers across several relays. Perhaps a DVM could help aggregate these for quicker responses.

I am not sure, however, how we find people to run classification models and provide those labels publicly for free.
Avatar
Mazin 1y ago

Ok last post I’ll bring it full circle, sorry for all the spam. I’d consider this separate to the current implementation but..

I could make a DVM that accepts event(s) as input and charges for their classification. The paid classification could get published widely via a NIP-32 event. Then we slowly build an open classification database paid for by users? Does that make any sense?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
hodlbod 1y ago

Yeah, I think everything you said makes sense. The benefit of adding DVMs into the mix would be to foster interoperability through a standard interface that works for free/open providers, or for multiple paid providers to compete on quality of service rather than quality of interface. So building for DVMs run separate from relays. Maybe that's not optimal for you, but it's healthier for nostr as a whole (and easier for clients to integrate).