Replying to ihsotas

No the argument is there is no software problem that stays difficult for long so worrying about a relay policy default is retarded. You can change the default or you can run knots or you can just not run a node which is probably the reality.

If your argument is small op return will keep illegal material off the chain you have some growing up to do.
Avatar
Baerson 2mo ago

I'll say it one last time.

Before core v30. CSAM was difficult to put on Bitcoin's network.

After core v30. CSAM is now much easier to put on Bitcoin's network.

CSAM is one of THE most disgusting and horrible things in this world. It is vile and destroys life. It belongs nowhere, and should be supported by no one.

Anything that promotes it, makes it easier or simpler to distribute or doesn't try to extinguish it, is wrong - morally wrong.

Bitcoin is money. Bitcoin should not be built to facilitate anything but money.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

f7
ihsotas 2mo ago

We are having two different conversations. No one is arguing in favor of csam, you just fail to grasp reality. Putting arbitrary data into 1000 transactions vs 1 large op return is not really that different. It’s literally software…so line a script to automate things.

If you depend on software being slightly more difficult to operate to protect you I fear you will live in disappointment.

Avatar
Baerson 2mo ago

I've always been having the one convo. I couldn't be clearer.

You support the change to make arbitrary data easier to store on Bitcoin, I do not. I question why the change was made in the first place, and that we do not need the change, especially if it supports easier distribution of CSAM, you do not.

You say I'm retarded, need to grow up and accept reality, I say Bitcoin is money and changes to it blur that line are unnecessary, and in this case, wrong.