I agree, but that is reason why i wrote about it.
Under FUTO are some good FOSS apps and some which are not FOSS.
nostr:npub193pcsgj0mn2s7f898j4eh2j2kczlpplg93zcwq6swf5s7venzz5sgmm5gn It's not possible to change from a pre-existing copyleft license without permission from every contributor or somehow removing all their code and all code based on it which is not practical since who knows what got based on it elsewhere. AGPL also prevents them introducing code under their own heavily restricted non-commercial usage license. They could theoretically pay the contributors and relicense the code though.
Discussion
nostr:npub193pcsgj0mn2s7f898j4eh2j2kczlpplg93zcwq6swf5s7venzz5sgmm5gn That one wasn't written by them and it's not yet clear what they're going to do with it. If they could change the license, they probably would.
Yes, but still it's proof that we can't throw away any app with “FUTO” logo on it. We need make decision case by case