There is not a single internet user who likes cookie banners. Many may not understand why exactly they're so widespread, but everyone definitely knows they are "mandatory" in some way, and everyone would be happier without them. Also all programmers, designers and product managers know they are awful.

Yet these big corporate websites keep trying to blatantly lie to their visitors saying stuff like "we value your privacy" in the cookie banners, perhaps because for some weird reason they think that that will "soften" the negative impact of the banners.

Why lie? Why not admit the thing is being forced upon them and just do the minimal they're required to?

This is just one example case among many in which well-meaning people lie for completely unjustifiable reasons.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Can confirm we hate it as designers. Popups are already annoying and abundant.

I always wish i could get away with designing one that said “Your government is forcing us to show you this”

What is preventing you? Other people wanting to lie, I imagine.

Maybe you could at least do something very small with a big button like "Click here to close this annoying banner."

You got it. Clients/companies wanting to sound safe and professional, therefore indirectly lying.

And projects that i had enough control over could get away without having the banners. The internet has gotten so unusable with how unfriendly most sites have gotten so my motto is clean design and omit anything not adding value.

"We and our 862 partners value your privacy" ok bud sure

People want to be lied to

Of course they could just stop using cookies.

This is the real reason. Regulations require banners when there is needless tracking occurring. Do companies reduce their tracking? No – they make the banners as invasive as possible, and blame it on regulation

Of course it's the fault of regulation.

Users just can configure their browsers to block cookies if they want.

They can set their computer on fire as well... not sure what one has to do with the other

Without taking about the fact that 95℅ of the consensus banners are not functional, due to implementation errors or mostly due to explicit will.

It's a total nonsense.

They earn more money when you give them all your privacy vs. the essentials.

It's not technically a lie; the value is literally realized in realtime ad bids.

I really like the "complain" on Lantern. Did you do that or was it already there?

I believe it said something else and linked to their docs or something like that.

It's as entertaining as it is honest.

Indeed. I become increasing perplexed that this basic, pointless & pervasive dishonest & disingenuous behaviour is simply accepted by people who would otherwise value honesty & genuineness, with no apparent loss to the reputation of the individuals/organisations involved.

It is as if most people have become so used to abusive relationships with basic service providers it has become normalised, or worse, preferred ...

I have a simple mindset with regard to cookies.

if you put a BIG STICK saying 'Accept cookies with a fuck ton of toggles' I leave the site.

If it's at the bottom I ignore it