What? No one said the devs are malicious...

I'm cautioning users to not jump to custodial solutions when they can instead wait and push devs to do non-custodial solutions!

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

"Let's do this right from the beginning" doesn't imply they have done things wrong? Not trying to tone police, I thought you were negging just to flex.

How would "Let's" imply I'm hating on devs?

I'm talking to *users*.

The people making the protocol have no say or control over what LN Address/NIP-57 wallet people use, I'm talking to users who are choosing custodial wallets.

Fair. Users *should* push for noncustodial support. We should also go easy on #Nostr devs. They've been pedal to the metal since the protocols unexpected early success.

Yet again, I never even mentioned Nostr devs, they're not even a part of this discussion or issue as the NIP properly lays out everything needed for non-custodial usage.

Have never said a bad thing about Nostr devs, please stop jumping to conclusions

What are those non-custodial solutions?

Have heard there's a self-hosted LnTipsBot being built, and I'll be using BTCPay Server (already am!) when NIP-57 support is added.

There are ways to receive tips/Zap sats, but not to properly notify the network of Zap events yet.