How would you suggest we come to “one true interpretation” on a question that can’t ever been proven in one way or another? We just agree and close the book on it?
There isn’t just one interpretation of anything. We are all living in our own realities and perceiving things differently even when they are empirical truths.
Also, I’ve never come across epistemology, what would you like me to know about it? I’m kinda retarded, please keep this in mind.
🫂🫂🫂
What can’t be proven one way or the other?
Some things are subjective. I’d say those probably can’t be proven at least not soon. Others are not subjective. Whether the DNA creates sound frequencies that match UV light is not subjective. Whether this or true is a question of experiment not of the soul. If experimental data suggests it’s true, then it might be. Absent that data, we don’t know. With that data, one true interpretation emerges.
Other kinds of questions like “what does it mean to my soul to be a grandparent of a deaf child” probably can’t be answered in a prove-able way. Those should be the subject of deep thought and discussion as they exist largely beyond the empirical realm.
too much scientism,
too much woo woo
leaves a boy anxious,
lonely and blue.
its true that if you seek
then surely you will find
herein you'll find a pretty gem
of the seekin that was "mine".
link to book at archive is at the end of the longform
