I came here because I want to interact, make frens, and share what I like and what I'm building.

So many people treat their social media as their job, turn it off and walk away after they get their leads. They don't care about real connections, they care about an audience, affirmations, and line go up. They plan, they learn the *game*, they watch the analytics, they watch YOU, as a capitalist I hazard to use the word exploit, but something close to it. I think this is a function of twitter and other curated/paid advertising platforms, that incentivizes this behavior.

idk, just some thoughts that keep me dreaming of a better future

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Social has become synonymous with marketing. There’s nothing wrong with that it’s just the nature of things but it can get very annoying especially when everyone optimizes for it.

I’m not sure if nostr fixes it but it can reduce virality which could help.

Not saying nostr fixes this at all, but I really want to build a space where we can have conversations and community again, where it's not all about a handful of people trying to build a business out of eyballs.

Freedom tech is the way … You are in the right spot! Welcome 🙏

Happy to have met you on here. 👍 Welcome to the party!

Was just having a similar conversation recently. All the people I followed on Instagram (majority were pattern designers for knit or crochet things) would schedule out their posts for a month or more according to the algorithm at the time and only interact with the first couple of responses or the responses of other designers. I don't miss it.

Yeah and the unfortunate part is that's the majority of the content, it really makes you feel like a consumer. I don't miss it either!

Yes! So glad there are other people fed up with it, just wish there were more.

Totally unrelated

NGL, saw your profile name, thought I'd fond chiptune music... Not actual chips. 🤣

lol, it's from my past, automotive calibration engineering. aka chip tuning in the older days!

Nostr is a chance for us to rehumanize social media.

We can't do it with only a Twitter-style timeline feed. That's an important view, but it's become so all-consuming.

nostr:nevent1qqsyvz9j76e43mf3fxl7cx670zwj2sdm6aet0nyrq8md4lz5nyv364cpr3mhxue69uhhg6r9vd5hgctyv4kzumn0wd68yvfwvdhk6tczyqpk2v724perw62x6nj0m6jvrgzyrmdr3j3dnk2p0wekqpkt42l4sqcyqqqqqqg7kx2pt

Exactly…imagine if social media was actually social

I think it can be :)

came for the tech

stayed for the frens

I am hoping for a better interaction than the other centralised platform. 2 weeks on Nostr consistent posting. However, I noticed that as a community we are all responsible of what type of content we promote to engage or how we engage. Otherwise, the people will be the same but the tech is different. Real value, humanise more our interactions and not just a number, a metric of engagement.

Yeah I mean at the moment, were just kind of one bit community. No quiet niches yet so I think that's true. I've never used twitter but I imagine this is why the genuine human interaction side failed miserably imo.

Ad-driven "Infuencer" social media:

Reach > Quality

Zap driven nostr:

Reach < Quality

In the long time preference yes. I really dream of the period where creators produce enough value in their content they can sustain themselves. Although I don't know that I believe that the idea that content itself is sustaining, I believe it still should have a business component to it, but free markets should prove me right or wrong.

I think in the short term, if we stick on the path were on, ad monetization is nearly impossible on the platforms themselves, so it's a good thing long term, loss aversion in the short term for on-boarding. In many ways ads become a plague imo. Ads are necessary, and I do think people want to be advertised too, but it goes too far every time. OTA, cable, streaming platforms, etc.

Anyway I'm excited for that future and hope we as builders can stay focused on that because the legacy systems don't want that.

In almost every case sponsorship of a podcast in the bitcoin space is indication of a poor quality product that is losing market share. Maybe a few bad eggs stink up the entire lot, but its becoming a pattern. The problem with B2C direct advertising is its rarely done to inform, but to brainwash. When a "creator" takes on a sponsor, 98% of the time, they are selling the social capital they built with their audience to the purpose of brainwashing through subconcious manipulation to the benefit of a third party of ambiguous character. As a business trying to navigate this "sales and marketing" space, its looking a whole lot more like S&M than lead generation and business development (yea I knowz loaded terms) and I have yet to be convinced its effective if not immoral at its foundation.

Can totally agree and usually the excuse is "well that's just the way business is if you want to keep sharing your message" "take the good with the bad" type stuff. I think there is some truth to that, but maybe we have better tools now it's just a matter of getting there.

I was mining in 2012-2013 before one of the first big price spikes (10-100 usd), difficulty soared and asics of the time became obsolete. I didn't know what I was doing and stepped out of the "community" I was pretty young anyway and didn't have the money to keep up. I got back into "bitcoin" media and stuff a few years ago and it's so much different that it was. And it seems like majority of the media was captured by suits. Just a strange observation from outside looking in. I don't think there are clear parallels to what bitcoin was back then other than most of the tools were hacked together with $0 in budget :)