You’re killing it!!
For us normies, what makes it nostr-native? nostr:note1hdj9vmta869jg8625hlscr3vmzchj0ujhn0zxy0hjzecxnxs9k9srhxkxk
You’re killing it!!
For us normies, what makes it nostr-native? nostr:note1hdj9vmta869jg8625hlscr3vmzchj0ujhn0zxy0hjzecxnxs9k9srhxkxk
maybe something to connect with ostrich.work i suppose, but i don't see the necessity in this, hope to be enlightened soon
You could upload your resume to LinkedIn or Monster.com or whenever the kids are using these days and not own your data or you could have the data stored on a relay where you control the data. It's the same for any use case. You're either in control, or you're not.
don't the relay operators control my data then?
It’s a matter of numbers (as many as you like) and choice (which ever you like). So in that light… you’re in control to publish and to keep it published to any and as many relays as you like.
They can't change it. They can only delete it. Don't want someone deleting your data? Run your own relay.
Tanel these are all the same arguments we've had on "why nostr" for a year and a half. What don't you specifically get here in this example that you understand for another? What's the difference?
While I agree LinkedIn is ripe for the taking do not forget
People go to LinkedIn to make money.
Part of that equation is the network effect.
I think a network effect of even just freedom tech people could happen but that’s just as critical as the software itself.
Maybe progression looks like: Bitcoiners -> software shops in general -> some other adjacent industries -> ?? -> LinkedIn’s rent seeking days are over
The data for your CV stays in nostr and any resume client can then use or render it for you. Imagine 1 data source, 1000s of templates for you to choose from.