It's still open source which is the only point I'm making here. You don't have to "trust" them like people keep implying.
Discussion
No it's not & you're purposely misleading people if your code isn't FOSS & you're calling it "OPEN".
OPEN = FREE TO USE
Your source is "VIEWABLE" if it's use is restricted.
Which is obviously better than closed source.
That's obviously not true, if it was there'd be no need for the term FOSS. Hell, some people even differentiate between FOSS and FLOSS.
