Okay, got the first full #Bible preformatted in Asciidoc, ready for the #Alexandria parser. ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿผ

https://github.com/ShadowySupercode/gitcitadel/tree/master/eBooks/Bible/Completed

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I think I might have to work on the Appendix some more. It's so huge, and such wall of text, that it broke my IDE. ๐Ÿ˜‚

Needs to be split into more levels, I think.

Each verse is going to be a separate zettel event, so we'll be able to embedded individual Bible verses in other notes. ๐Ÿฅณ

The indexes over each verse will be chapters and chapters will be grouped into books. Once all of the books are events, I'll be pulling them into more indexes, for example Gospel:NewTestament:Bible, so that there's a hierarchical ToC with 4 levels.

๐Ÿ‘€

Would be great if highlight-able too!

Yes, that's definitely planned. ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿผ

30041s will be highlightable and 30040s will be receiving Kind 1111 comments.

What are: 30040, 30041, 1111 kinds?

Will the above structure you are working on apply to all e-books?

Kind 1111 is the new comment event for NIP-29. Should be merged soon.

https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/1233

We have a NUD called NKBIP for a Nostr Knowledge Base, that also works for publishing anything hierarchical and sectionable, like a book or a magazine or audiobook, etc.

https://wikistr.com/nkbip-01*70122128273bdc07af9be7725fa5c4bc0fc146866bec38d44360dc4bc6cc18b9

Our app won't handle Kind 01 notes, since we won't have a microblogging feed.

30040 is an index, that contains an ordered list of 30040 and 30041 events, and 30041 is a zettel, that contains the actual content.

30041 is a zettel - an index card of information, similar to an Obsidian note.

30040 groups zettels together, which means that individual notes no longer are in isolation, you can chain them together, like sections or paragraphs of a book can be chained together. Or you can create a collage of notes you think are related.

the idea being - not only can notes & ideas be linked together with hyperlinks or tags, they can be contextualized in the form of an article "this note belongs to a larger narrative". Also, you can decontextualize articles "this paragraph is super important to me more than the rest of the article, i'll group it together with related ideas, while simultaneously pointing to the original source/context it comes from"

So, as you peruse someone's article/collage of notes, find something with high signal to you, you can go directly to the source where it was written and absorb learn the context it comes from.

A highlight can sit on top - it functions as a "hey look here at this high quality idea from this source" to your followers.

Highlights can be a subset of a note, or across multiple sections of an article. Highlighting overlays over articles are definitely something we'd like to have as well.

We're planning on the KJV as the next one, and then the Lutherbibel (in German).

Good question! Iโ€™m sure thereโ€™s some Septuagint translations like maybe Brentonโ€™s isnโ€™t copyright protected but the first one that comes to mind is NET/WEBUS because they def donโ€™t have copyright protection and have a lot of interesting footnotes too

Interesting. Hadn't seen those before.

which translation is this? I'm a KJV maxi.

Douay-Rheims

How did you type Hebrew and Greek in ASCII? ;)

LOL Nah, it's just the markup language, not the content language.