That is a perspective I’ve received in criticism to my spending of premium for bitcoin. So what you’re saying is the extra layer of anonymity and privacy has little impact on a belligerent government intent on blocking transactions, holistically versus individually. So, in fact, although I have these greater enhancements, they mean nothing if I cannot transact within my own country. Is that what you were saying?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I'm saying at the end of the day it. Doesn't matter if you have non KYC or KYC you still gonna be able to spend your bitcoin the KYC and non KYC thing is is if you send to an exchange. That's how they know it's you... And non KYC and KYC that's to scare people at the end of the day. It doesn't matter you still gonna be able to spend your bitcoin wherever whenever on whatever you want

OK that makes sense. So it is far better to spend peer to peer versus on-ramping to an exchange. Spending within a circular economy that transact only in bitcoin.

Yes definitely.. i but on exchange but i dont send back

This is the goal ... lol

Did people forget bitcoin is permissionless lmao