Interesting, I think you're right, but it goes against the BIP16 definition.

So, it seems bip16 is NON confiscatory but the code implementation IS.

But I wasn't always like that, it seems Gavin started with a timestamp:

https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/8f188ece3c82c4cf5d52a3363e7643c23169c0ff#diff-34d21af3c614ea3cee120df276c9c4ae95053830d7f1d3deaf009a4625409ad2R1282

But that variable (nBIP16SwitchTime) is now gone from the code.

Interesting, I would like to have the time to investigate this further.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Even bip16 seems to create a confiscation deadline. It says all txs created after the deadline should have the new rules applied to them. So the ~5 people who previously used hash160 hashlocks would have to move those utxos before the deadline or else their outputs would become unspendable. Which is exactly what happened; one such output was already moved, the rest did not move and became unspendable.

Seems like it sets a precedent for setting confiscation deadlines in new bips