Replying to Avatar Mandrik

I'll say shit, nostr:npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx. Saylor is not here for freedom maximalism, has attacked the idea of Bitcoin as a MoE, and, based on what you're saying, doesn't support Bitcoin development.

End the hero worship. It's never a good look.

nostr:nevent1qqsfw5g7dp7ef6q8y0unnzlvwrwdztpenld2eaeqv6m3yyaastey64cpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsygqyey2a4mlw8qchlfe5g39vacus4qnflevppv3yre0xm56rm7lveypsgqqqqqqsar9mf8

Saylor should not be worshipped, but I genuinely think it's probably better for Saylor not to support any change to Bitcoin & to set an example for all the dumbass legacy finance people to not support any change to bitcoin. They don't mine, they don't run nodes, we are still capable of making changes that need to be made. But there isn't much else that should be done to Bitcoin anyway. CTV & CISA would be amazing, but Bitcoin will also probably be fine without them.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.