I think this was true initially
At this point the narrative has gone so over the edge of core being malicious that a debate on technicalities is completely impossible imo
And that‘s on nobody but Luke and his two braincelled prodigee
Discussion
Isn’t this often the case that once things stay in the public eye like this nuance and prober discourse go out the window ? Leaving the idea of possible malicious intent to the side.
I don‘t think Luke has malicious intent
I think he is a hardcore autist who is actually concerned about CSAM and following the law that has psyched himself a bit too far into believing that he must save us all from these evils because otherwise the apocalypse will be upon us (which doesnt mean that this absolves him of responsibility)
But yes, imo the way our platforms are built exacerbates the doomsdaying and that is true for all things
The "journalist" tries to get back on her feet. By now she has lost so much credibility that she can safely be regarded a 3 letter agency asset.
I was looking at the malicious intent through both sides.
On core:
moving and deprecating a feature for users that their base are clearly are divided on, just feels like bad mgmt.
On Knots:
Dividing a community on the premises of CSAM.
My own 2 sats:
Although possible today we don’t need more ways to spam even if they are more expensive and still require other software to extract.
On luke personally don’t know the guy but this community is full of special folks 😄
Would love a platform that kinda prevents us all from getting too tribal on these cases ( a man can dream )
I think nostr actually does a really good job at that - its really become my happy place on the internet where i can choose what I see and engage however and how frequently i like as opposed to some nefarious algorithm deciding for me.
I agree re core to a degree as Im not versed enough on how harmful these currently workarounds are that are being used. I do think that a lot could have been mitigated by explaining these things clearly (Realizing that I have a media platform and that I could also do smth about that instead of complaining).
What I do think an interesting and very overlooked question in the spam debate is is who qualifies what counts as spam, and I find that a slippery slope - kind of like qualifying who a terrorist is.
Today it may be JPEGs, tomorrow it could be a rollup, etc.
You definitely are trying to use your platform for a good purposes I appreciate all the work 🫡 and we always can do better ✌️just keep on keeping on
Yeah I just think a bit of give on the core side would go a long way. Mike Schmidt started doing this by putting up a pr to un-deprecate datacarriersize and it’s a good start.