Replying to Avatar alenasatoshi

I wanted to understand how Bitcoin resonates with the Muslim world and Sharia law, so I explored a bit and wrote this short article. lmk what you think and whether I made any mistakes in the thinking process or understanding.

---

** IS BITCOIN A SHARIA-COMPLIANT ASSET? **

The question of Bitcoin’s compliance with Islamic finance principles (Sharia) has sparked some debate among scholars, investors and bitcoin / crypto fans.

There seems to be no universal consensus, and I'm no Muslim but it seems to me from what I've read that Bitcoin’s design aligns very well with core Islamic values of transparency, fairness, and resistance to exploitation.

Below, I explore Bitcoin's Sharia compatibility through the lens of ethics, technology, and practical application.

---

1. CORE SHARIA PRINCIPLES AND BITCOIN’S ARCHITECTURE

Islamic finance prohibits *riba* (interest/usury), *gharar* (excessive uncertainty), and mandates *hifz al-mal* (preservation of wealth). Bitcoin’s protocol directly addresses these concerns.

Bitcoin’s code contains no interest mechanisms, making it inherently free from *riba*. Transactions occur peer-to-peer without intermediaries, and mining rewards compensate computational work rather than interest-based returns. This contrasts sharply with fiat systems (or with Proof-of-Stake systems) which rely on fractional reserve banking and debt-driven money creation—practices deeply entangled with *riba*.

The network’s deterministic monetary policy—capped at 21 million coins, with a transparent issuance schedule—eliminates the systemic *gharar* inherent in fiat currencies (subject to central bank manipulation) or that of gold (whose supply fluctuates with mining discoveries). Every transaction and circulating coin is publicly verifiable on the blockchain, ensuring contractual clarity and reducing ambiguity.

As for wealth preservation, Bitcoin’s scarcity and decentralization protect against inflationary devaluation. While its short-term volatility draws criticism, long-term appreciation trends (e.g., compounding growth since 2010) suggest it meets *hifz al-mal* for investors prioritizing durability over stability.

---

2. SCHOLARLY OPINIONS: DIVERGENCE AND PROGRESS

Islamic scholars remain divided on this topic, but momentum is growing in Bitcoin’s favor. In 2018, Indonesia’s National Ulema Council recognized cryptocurrency as a tradable commodity, while Dubai-based scholar Mufti Muhammad Abu Bakar declared Bitcoin permissible (*halal*) if treated as an asset rather than currency.

Others, like Islamic Finance Guru argue Bitcoin is compliant *if* users avoid interest-bearing services (e.g., crypto lending), mirroring rulings on gold, which is permissible as an asset but forbidden in *riba*-based transactions. Critics, including Saudi Arabia’s Grand Mufti, reject cryptocurrencies due to volatility and speculative trading. However, this stance conflates Bitcoin’s *design* with human misuse—a distinction emphasized by progressive scholars.

---

3. BITCOIN VS. TRADITIONAL “COMPLIANT” ALTERNATIVES

Gold-backed assets and Islamic banking products are often touted as Sharia-compliant, but Bitcoin offers distinct advantages. In contrast to gold’s storage costs and opacity in custodianship, Bitcoin’s blockchain provides a public, auditable ledger. Unlike real estate—a popular Islamic investment—Bitcoin democratizes access to scarcity without high entry barriers. Most critically, Bitcoin’s decentralization ensures no central authority can debase it, unlike fiat systems that enable *riba* through interest rate manipulation.

---

4. RISKS AND MITIGATIONS

Bitcoin’s Sharia compliance hinges on ethical usage. To avoid *riba*, investors must steer clear of interest-bearing platforms like crypto lending services. Speculative practices—day trading, derivatives, or leverage—introduce *gharar* and should be avoided in favor of long-term *HODLing*, which aligns with Islamic wealth preservation principles. Prioritizing Bitcoin’s original purpose—a censorship-resistant store of value and medium of exchange—strengthens its ethical case.

---

Conclusion: Bitcoin is not inherently *haram* (sinful, prohibited by Quran). Its architecture—scarce, transparent, and free from centralized manipulation—resonates deeply with Islamic financial ethics. While misuse (e.g., speculation, *riba* services) can render it non-compliant, the same risks apply to gold or real estate.

For Muslims exploring Bitcoin, intentionality is key: use it as a long-term store of value, avoid interest-based platforms. As Islamic finance wakes up to future technology, Bitcoin’s role as a *halal* hedge against fiat injustice will grow.

Muslims will do well, if they avoid riba. Anything giving yield on bitcoin will fail eventually - people will lose a lot because of their greed.

Now... We need to get Christians to remember that usury was once forbidden to us as well.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

When was usury forbidden to Christians? I don’t remember seeing that in the Bible. I just remember seeing debt forgiveness.

The Bible does contain passages that condemn usury. In the Old Testament, Exodus 22:25, Leviticus 25:35-37, and Deuteronomy 23:19-20 prohibit Israelites from charging interest to fellow Israelites, although they were allowed to charge interest to foreigners. (How gracious..)

In the New Testament, Jesus teaches about the importance of lending without expecting anything in return in Luke 6:30-35.

Usury is also addressed in several biblical passages, such as Psalm 15:5 and Ezekiel 18:8-9, which condemn those who lend at excessive interest rates.

I can make a similar analysis of Christian values vs Bitcoin, but there is already the book Thanks God for Bitcoin.

Agreed, but it doesn’t seem like it’s was strictly forbidden like in Islam.

Nope and it magically managed to favor one ethnic group over anyone else..

lol. Shalom.

Usury was outright illegal for over a thousand years throughout Europe, and by illegal I mean that the catholic church didn't allow it. Usury became accepted because of Calvin's teaching, and even then it took a couple of hundred years for non Calvinist protestants to start allowing usury. And even then, what they did was redefine usury to "excess" interest - in excess of 6% usually. The major turning point was the US state of Delaware and credit cards. Idk if Delaware repealed usury laws or never had them, but there's a reason all the credit card companies are HQ'd in Delaware. Most states still have laws that prohibit excess usury, so credit cards can't be based there. Only a few decades ago (sorry for the vagueness - going off memory and it's not fresh) there was a court ruling that used the Commerce clause in the Constitution to say that the other states could not bar credit card companies from their states, thus making a whole swathe of laws moot and destroying the last shred of sovereignty of the states. States no more : provinces, in truth.

And how have Christians missed this entire saga? I have only suspicions... But my main suspicion is that the pastors are too easily corrupted and silenced, and too poorly educated anyways.

Sounds like for all history everyone knew fractional reserve banking and predatory debt was a bad idea, up until a short time ago.

Yes... well, it's cyclical. Rome collapsed because of currency debasement. Then a thousand years of sound money, though not well distributed sound money until Medici banking, then the dutch ruined it all with Calvin and their wisselbank

Define usury.

Read stuff

I do - unlike you, obviously. That's why I know there are different definitions.

See, I knew you would act childishly. That's why I didn't answer you.

Dude, how am *I* acting childishly?

Forbidding usury is an economic nonsense. I could write more if I knew, which definition of usury you subscribe to.

I dont have a definition either, but for example the btc lending that takes 10%pa and your bitcoin with 50% LTV is clearly usurious to me. But people on the other side of the game are more greedy and don't want to let go of their BTC. So to each what he deserves.

That's the thing. Value is purely subjective and there's no other way to tell, what's right except when supply and demand meet on a voluntary basis. If people don't want to let go of their btc (because of greed or risk aversion), you'll get a high price.