I wanted to understand how Bitcoin resonates with the Muslim world and Sharia law, so I explored a bit and wrote this short article. lmk what you think and whether I made any mistakes in the thinking process or understanding.

---

** IS BITCOIN A SHARIA-COMPLIANT ASSET? **

The question of Bitcoin’s compliance with Islamic finance principles (Sharia) has sparked some debate among scholars, investors and bitcoin / crypto fans.

There seems to be no universal consensus, and I'm no Muslim but it seems to me from what I've read that Bitcoin’s design aligns very well with core Islamic values of transparency, fairness, and resistance to exploitation.

Below, I explore Bitcoin's Sharia compatibility through the lens of ethics, technology, and practical application.

---

1. CORE SHARIA PRINCIPLES AND BITCOIN’S ARCHITECTURE

Islamic finance prohibits *riba* (interest/usury), *gharar* (excessive uncertainty), and mandates *hifz al-mal* (preservation of wealth). Bitcoin’s protocol directly addresses these concerns.

Bitcoin’s code contains no interest mechanisms, making it inherently free from *riba*. Transactions occur peer-to-peer without intermediaries, and mining rewards compensate computational work rather than interest-based returns. This contrasts sharply with fiat systems (or with Proof-of-Stake systems) which rely on fractional reserve banking and debt-driven money creation—practices deeply entangled with *riba*.

The network’s deterministic monetary policy—capped at 21 million coins, with a transparent issuance schedule—eliminates the systemic *gharar* inherent in fiat currencies (subject to central bank manipulation) or that of gold (whose supply fluctuates with mining discoveries). Every transaction and circulating coin is publicly verifiable on the blockchain, ensuring contractual clarity and reducing ambiguity.

As for wealth preservation, Bitcoin’s scarcity and decentralization protect against inflationary devaluation. While its short-term volatility draws criticism, long-term appreciation trends (e.g., compounding growth since 2010) suggest it meets *hifz al-mal* for investors prioritizing durability over stability.

---

2. SCHOLARLY OPINIONS: DIVERGENCE AND PROGRESS

Islamic scholars remain divided on this topic, but momentum is growing in Bitcoin’s favor. In 2018, Indonesia’s National Ulema Council recognized cryptocurrency as a tradable commodity, while Dubai-based scholar Mufti Muhammad Abu Bakar declared Bitcoin permissible (*halal*) if treated as an asset rather than currency.

Others, like Islamic Finance Guru argue Bitcoin is compliant *if* users avoid interest-bearing services (e.g., crypto lending), mirroring rulings on gold, which is permissible as an asset but forbidden in *riba*-based transactions. Critics, including Saudi Arabia’s Grand Mufti, reject cryptocurrencies due to volatility and speculative trading. However, this stance conflates Bitcoin’s *design* with human misuse—a distinction emphasized by progressive scholars.

---

3. BITCOIN VS. TRADITIONAL “COMPLIANT” ALTERNATIVES

Gold-backed assets and Islamic banking products are often touted as Sharia-compliant, but Bitcoin offers distinct advantages. In contrast to gold’s storage costs and opacity in custodianship, Bitcoin’s blockchain provides a public, auditable ledger. Unlike real estate—a popular Islamic investment—Bitcoin democratizes access to scarcity without high entry barriers. Most critically, Bitcoin’s decentralization ensures no central authority can debase it, unlike fiat systems that enable *riba* through interest rate manipulation.

---

4. RISKS AND MITIGATIONS

Bitcoin’s Sharia compliance hinges on ethical usage. To avoid *riba*, investors must steer clear of interest-bearing platforms like crypto lending services. Speculative practices—day trading, derivatives, or leverage—introduce *gharar* and should be avoided in favor of long-term *HODLing*, which aligns with Islamic wealth preservation principles. Prioritizing Bitcoin’s original purpose—a censorship-resistant store of value and medium of exchange—strengthens its ethical case.

---

Conclusion: Bitcoin is not inherently *haram* (sinful, prohibited by Quran). Its architecture—scarce, transparent, and free from centralized manipulation—resonates deeply with Islamic financial ethics. While misuse (e.g., speculation, *riba* services) can render it non-compliant, the same risks apply to gold or real estate.

For Muslims exploring Bitcoin, intentionality is key: use it as a long-term store of value, avoid interest-based platforms. As Islamic finance wakes up to future technology, Bitcoin’s role as a *halal* hedge against fiat injustice will grow.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Muslims will do well, if they avoid riba. Anything giving yield on bitcoin will fail eventually - people will lose a lot because of their greed.

Now... We need to get Christians to remember that usury was once forbidden to us as well.

When was usury forbidden to Christians? I don’t remember seeing that in the Bible. I just remember seeing debt forgiveness.

The Bible does contain passages that condemn usury. In the Old Testament, Exodus 22:25, Leviticus 25:35-37, and Deuteronomy 23:19-20 prohibit Israelites from charging interest to fellow Israelites, although they were allowed to charge interest to foreigners. (How gracious..)

In the New Testament, Jesus teaches about the importance of lending without expecting anything in return in Luke 6:30-35.

Usury is also addressed in several biblical passages, such as Psalm 15:5 and Ezekiel 18:8-9, which condemn those who lend at excessive interest rates.

I can make a similar analysis of Christian values vs Bitcoin, but there is already the book Thanks God for Bitcoin.

Agreed, but it doesn’t seem like it’s was strictly forbidden like in Islam.

Nope and it magically managed to favor one ethnic group over anyone else..

lol. Shalom.

Usury was outright illegal for over a thousand years throughout Europe, and by illegal I mean that the catholic church didn't allow it. Usury became accepted because of Calvin's teaching, and even then it took a couple of hundred years for non Calvinist protestants to start allowing usury. And even then, what they did was redefine usury to "excess" interest - in excess of 6% usually. The major turning point was the US state of Delaware and credit cards. Idk if Delaware repealed usury laws or never had them, but there's a reason all the credit card companies are HQ'd in Delaware. Most states still have laws that prohibit excess usury, so credit cards can't be based there. Only a few decades ago (sorry for the vagueness - going off memory and it's not fresh) there was a court ruling that used the Commerce clause in the Constitution to say that the other states could not bar credit card companies from their states, thus making a whole swathe of laws moot and destroying the last shred of sovereignty of the states. States no more : provinces, in truth.

And how have Christians missed this entire saga? I have only suspicions... But my main suspicion is that the pastors are too easily corrupted and silenced, and too poorly educated anyways.

Sounds like for all history everyone knew fractional reserve banking and predatory debt was a bad idea, up until a short time ago.

Yes... well, it's cyclical. Rome collapsed because of currency debasement. Then a thousand years of sound money, though not well distributed sound money until Medici banking, then the dutch ruined it all with Calvin and their wisselbank

Define usury.

Read stuff

I do - unlike you, obviously. That's why I know there are different definitions.

See, I knew you would act childishly. That's why I didn't answer you.

Dude, how am *I* acting childishly?

Forbidding usury is an economic nonsense. I could write more if I knew, which definition of usury you subscribe to.

I dont have a definition either, but for example the btc lending that takes 10%pa and your bitcoin with 50% LTV is clearly usurious to me. But people on the other side of the game are more greedy and don't want to let go of their BTC. So to each what he deserves.

That's the thing. Value is purely subjective and there's no other way to tell, what's right except when supply and demand meet on a voluntary basis. If people don't want to let go of their btc (because of greed or risk aversion), you'll get a high price.

Just curious what are you aiming at here? I'm pretty sure that Islam is not compatible with liberty, so even if Bitcoin is accepted, it won't change the rest of their society.

I thought I explained precisely what was my goal in my OP. I'm happy to learn anything valuable about Islam and its non-compatibility with liberty, so please do share specifics.

AFAIK, Islam prescribes leadership by religious authorities, basically a form of theocracy.

Disclaimer: I'm no expert on Islam, so feel free to fact check me.

I will have to dig into it a bit, no expert either.

Interestingly, the christian bible talked originally about God taking a half (side) of Adam and making Eva to his (equal) partner. But somehow it got co-opted with translations into "the rib", subordinating the position of a woman to the man henceforth.

All these are interesting things to learn, but also a reason why I don't accept religious leaders of any kind.

A whole another topic is how an individual person lives and what moral guidance does he stick to, regardless of their religious scripts.

And so I'm not ready to condemn a Muslim or a Christian or a Jew -- as long as they're not following their "torahs" literally in trying to subordinate every living human to their needs, or keeping women as slaves etc. If they do, I want nothing with such people.

I don't want to condemn any individual for his religion either - simply because of the fact that one is usually born into a particular religious environment and has limited possibilities to get himself rid of it.

But I do believe that the theologies are very different, Christianity, being mostly a spiritual teaching, gives you a lot of leeway in other areas of your life. Islam seems to be pretty strict and has a lot to say regarding economics, politics and personal life.

Yeah it does. Similar to the system of Torah and Rabbis who seem to be supreme guides for every fart trying to get out of its pants. But I'm happy to learn if there's anyone more educated on this.

I don't see it there. To my knowledge, Jesus was a hippie preaching love and tolerance. But again - I'm no expert so it's possible that something insidious is lurking behind the scenes.

And I know even less about Judaism, so I can just use my heuristics and say that Israel seems to be a pretty chill democracy, unlike vast majority of countries in the region.

Israel seems pretty chill? So genocide is chill to you? Meanwhile the entire gulf region is the safest region on earth?

This conversation is crazy 🤪

But one thing you said that I totally agree with, you DONT know much about the topic. Not Christianity, Judaism and definitely not about Islam.

Are you accusing Israel of genocide? Are you aware that the population of Gaza has tripled in just last 30 years? That would be the lousiest genocide in history. :D

Do you know who is attempting genocide? The “from the river to the sea” people. You obviously don’t understand what the Palestinian chief slogan means, so I invite you to look at the map. (On second look, you are a Muslim, so you are obviously just biased.)

So yes, I’m constantly amazed, how chill and humane Israelis are towards the people, who are trying to eradicate them (as expressed by electing Hamas) for decades, if not centuries.

Entire gulf region the safest on earth? Go visit Yemen, lol! The countries you are referring to (SA, UAE) are strict autocracies. So this is pretty bad argument – the people kept in line by strict laws and oil money.

I would reply to your ridiculous response, but you are clearly arguing in bad faith, so pointless. Have a nice day.

That's what I thought. 😉

What a dupe.....

Man, go read some history from a non-biased non-western source. Yeah, sure accuse the Muslims of bias, but ignore your own western biases. Not our problem, as Arabs, that some British foreign minister promised Jewish people our lands, and not our problem Europeans imposed European Jews on us, and surely it is our absolute right to defend our lands.

Yes, we were at a weak spot. But that's the nature of civilization. Having said that, doesn't give the West the right to impose a colonialist project on us.

Bible, Torah, or Quran... None of these has anything to do with rights to the land. The right to the land belongs to those who live in it. And in 1917, when Balfour gave is wicked declaration, only 3% of the population were jews; Arab jews mostly at that.

To be sure, the relegiosity of the claim to the land seem to be unique to the Old Testament and maybe the New Testament; I haven't read them fully. The Quran doesn't say anything about Palestine belonging to anyone in particular. It says however that the owners of the land have the right to defend; in coherence to UN rules and much-touted Rules Based Order.

Now, answer me this, why on earth do Israelis have "the right to defend themselves" as an occupier, a century long aggressor, but the occupied people do not share the same right even though, in reality, they are the ones actually defending themselves?

Here is a good start: read the Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine by Ilan Pappe, an Israeli who taught at the Hebrew University (if I'm not mistaken).

/rant

A right to land can only belong to an individual and could be gained only via trade or homesteading. Israelis are not occupiers, they bought the land and paid for it. Regarding "colonialism", I can point you here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35eEljsSQfc

Trade? What trade? Go read the book I referred you to.

Homesteading? Where? After Israelis kicked out most of the Palestinians? History doesn't start with the white man, you know. Those people were there for millenia, and no European jews belong to Europe, regardless of what you say about the Torah.

Beyond this point, and after reading the cascade of misconceptions you have about Muslims and Palestine, I should stop arguing.

I'll watch your video for laughs.. Maybe I'm a lost cause to you as you are to me. ✌🏼

Thanks for the venting space, have a good day.

Yeah, the Jews bought the land in Israel fair and square. Meanwhile they were exterminated everywhere Islam achieved majority. That's all that matters.

You communicate in the same dishonest and aggressive way I see all Muslims do. You try to convince me with false arguments while calling me a dupe and disregarding any counterarguments as "for laughs".

Meanwhile I have no horse in this race. (I'm not Jewish.) I'm only interested in facts and logic. And once again you've convinced me that Israelis are the victims of unjustified hatred and oppression.

Yeah yeah yeah.. You expect a non-aggressive approach when you bring your lies and colonialist mentality here, expect nothing less.

Good day..

Why would I lie? Like I said, I have no horse in this race - unlike you. I've only responded with what I consider to be verified facts.

What colonialist mentality? My country of birth never colonized anyone - unlike Muslim regimes, which colonized all of middle east and north Africa.

Yeah, bad faith allover..

Again, if you want truth go read the book I referred to, expose yourself to a new perspective.

FYI, nothing you said above is something I never heard before. I heard it all before, and I reject it all. Maybe there are kernels of truths here and there, but it's absolutely myopic it doesn't show anything but one perspective; the Western perspective. It has nothing to do with ours. So, if your truthful to your claim that you have no horse in this race, expose yourself other people's perspectives.

What bad faith? Where?

Anyway, I've read quite enough about the topic already, considering it's not affecting me personally. In my experience truth is usually simple. It's lies that need to be complicated. So I'm not gonna read a whole book about this. If you can present these allegedly game-changing facts in a short paragraph or video I would be happy to consider them.

I explained it, you adopt a clearly Western perspective, which is bad faith under the claim of neutrality.

I'll find you a video for sure, as this cannot be put succinctly in one paragraph. Or maybe DYOR 😅.

It's not a western perspective, it's facts. But sure, I'll wait for your video.

Honestly, it is a Western perspective because only the West and their lackies accept them as facts. There is a totally different version of what happened and why it's happening elsewhere in the world. That's precisely why you got this reaction from me, and will probably continue to get this reaction from this who dont adhere to Western version of the story.

I picked this video not because it's comprehensive, but more because Ilan Pappe is an Israeli history professor and he is telling facts that he researched in Israeli archives. It only tells part of the story, but reality is the struggle started much earlier than 1948. Enjoy:

https://youtu.be/ldIfup1F8D4?feature=shared

If you wish to know more about it from a different perspective, please let me know. And finally, I apologize for the aggressive response.

You'll find your precious logic once you drop the pretenses and biases.

I’d like to thank you for taking the time to look into the topic, especially considering you’re not Muslim. Thanks, I really appreciate it.

I was born in london into a Christian family and raised a Christian until my late teens when I became a Muslim convert. I later travelled to Saudi Arabia, learnt Arabic and gained a degree in Islamic law, so I have a perspective from both sides.

I got into Bitcoin around 2016/17 and have been advocating for the Islamic alignment Bitcoin has, and a lot of what you said resonates with what I’ve observed myself. I wrote an Islamic ‘ruling’ (given I am a specialist in Islamic law) so if you wanted to dig a bit deeper you can have a read here: https://www.metamadeenah.com/a-statement-on-21-million/

Just thought I would add a few comments about what you wrote, to give something extra to contemplate.

**Theres no code for interest**

One of the features I absolutely love about Bitcoin is that its framework is not built on the premise of ‘mining coin with interest bearing loans’ which is the case with fiat, as you highlighted. It’s like gold. But you can still borrow it at interest, just like gold. So from that perspective we should still abstain from doing so, but you don’t need it to be coded into it for it to be possible.

**Gharar**

This has been slighting misunderstood in my perspective by many. Gharar means ‘financial ambiguity that hinders one’s ability to effectively evaluate the value of the item up for sale’. So if I wanted to buy a house, but was told I can’t look at it yet until I sign the contract, that’s prohibited in Islam. I need adequate information so that I can evaluate the value of what I want to buy. A small amount of unavoidable Gharar is accepted, like knowing how good the foundation of a building is, or how well a car was looked after from the previous owner, as you can’t get 100% knowledge on everything, but total ambiguity is not allowed. This doesn’t make sense when it comes to Bitcoin, because its value is known, and what you’re getting and giving is known. The supply isn’t really as relevant, much like the supply of iPhones on the market is irrelevant. It might matter to you the supply of a currency, but even if you didn’t (like with fiat, gold and altcoins like ETH) that doesn’t mean there is any ambiguity in the Bitcoin you have in hand right now.

**Wealth preservation**

The intent of wealth preservation in Islam is more about the wealth itself and not the value of it. Meaning, Islam forbids one from destroying wealth, like rolling a car off a cliff because one felt like it, destroying entire cities like what Israel did to Gaza etc, this is forbidden. Even in war, we’re not allowed to destroy the wealth of ppl, even if they are the opposition. So dropping a nuclear bomb into the middle of two cities (for example) would be absolutely forbidden. Not just for the murder of civilians (which is also forbidden in Islam) but also for the destruction of wealth. This is the meaning of destruction of wealth.

Inflation isn’t really that. Inflation is the adjustment of the value of something due to supply and demand. I can have inflation even if the money supply is fixed, due to supply related issues. Nobody calls that ‘destruction of wealth’. If you had a car, and the market got flooded with the same model, therefore the market price of your car drops, your car is still there and still has its functionality. Nothing has been destroyed.

**Scholars view of Bitcoin**

This is a nuanced discussion, but also not an interesting one. Many ppl outside Islam see Islamic scholars differing and think “oh they are divided” but are unaware that “agreement” is rare. Islam doesn’t have a clergy like Catholics and orthodox Christians. Every scholar is free to have their own opinions, and they do. It’s a lot more decentralised than ppl on the outside think. So because of that, scholars differ on almost everything lol 😂. That’s why we, as Muslims, focus on the evidence and reasons for the opinions we take, and not on the individual. A bit like bitcoiners (or how bitcoiners would like to be). We love Satoshi for what he brought, but we can also say that many things about Bitcoin he originally designed was flawed. That’s not controversial. That’s why we had segwit lol 😂.

So to conclude, I personally believe that with Bitcoin, scholars will eventually change their view of Bitcoin once they learn more about it, because their negative view is more built on a misunderstanding of how it works than what it actually is. Here is a video I made to demonstrate that.

https://youtu.be/Vruh9rTW7hs

But yeah, your article was overall well written and researched. I just wanted to add some nuance to it from a Muslim perspective, especially as Islamic law is my field.

There was a comment someone made about Islam being incompatible with bitcoins idea of ‘liberty’…I’d say, ignore him. He, as he admitted, doesn’t know what he’s talking about, especially as he thinks Israel ‘is pretty chill’ while at the same time it’s the only nation in the region engaging in apartheid and genocide.

Oh wow thanks a lot!

I'll take some time to check the links you shared and get back later.

Take your time. The more informed we all are, the better we can be at inviting ppl to a better form of money and away from the parasitic fiat world.