this video demonstrates everything you need to know about healthcare science from 2020-2024
https://blossom.primal.net/fd20e197e19b7b906ef78e5df587225ce134de5a6818d7f590206098a40103a8.mp4
this video demonstrates everything you need to know about healthcare science from 2020-2024
https://blossom.primal.net/fd20e197e19b7b906ef78e5df587225ce134de5a6818d7f590206098a40103a8.mp4
Next time you go for surgery, tell your surgeon to take off the mask.
maybe i should đ¤
Lipp A, Edwards P. **Surgical face masks to reduce bacterial contamination of the surgical field: effectiveness and harms.** Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(2):CD006087. PubMed PMID: 26819913.
[2] Tunevall TG. **Postoperative wound infections and the use of an occlusive face mask by the surgical team.** Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1991 Mar;12(3):155-9. PubMed PMID: 1906247.
[3] Webster J, Croger S, Lister C, Doidge M, Terry MJ, Jones I. **Use of face masks by non-scrubbed personnel in the operating room during clean surgery: a randomised controlled trial.** ANZ J Surg. 2010 Apr;80(4):243-9. PubMed PMID: 20546154.
[4] Orr NW. **Is a mask necessary in the operating theatre?** Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1981 Sep;63(5):390-2. PubMed PMID: 7025465; PMCID: PMC2493966.
You do that and let us know
Tunevall et al., 1991
- Single-center RCT in Varberg, Sweden, 1984â1989.
- Population: 4,087 âcleanâ or âclean-contaminatedâ elective general-surgery cases.
- Mask group:Staff used masks (control).
- No-mask group: Staff used **no masks (intervention).
- Outcome: Surgical-site infection (SSI) rate within 30 days.
- Results: Infection rate 3.5 % with masks vs. 3.5 % without masks (p = 0.95).
- Interpretation: The trial had only 50 % power to detect the 20 % relative difference the authors pre-specified as clinically important. A post-hoc power analysis showed it could have missed a true difference.
- Limitations: Single center, no blinding, outdated aseptic techniques.
Webster et al., 1978
- Design: 3-week crossover RCT in London teaching hospitals.
- Population: 3,088 gynaecologic surgery patients over three years.
- Mask group vs. no-mask group**: Same surgical teams alternated every week.
- Results: No statistically significant difference in SSI rates (â 2 % in each group).
- Limitations:
- Short follow-up;
- Masking was not double-blinded;
- No sample-size calculation;
- Modern prophylaxis not used (no single-dose antibiotics).
Orr, 1981 (non-RCT)
- Design: Retrospective chart review before/after policy change.
- Population: 1,308 clean hernia repairs.
- Findings: SSI rates dropped after masks were abandoned, but the change coincided with simultaneous improvements in ventilation and prophylactic antibiotics, so causation cannot be inferred.
- The 2016Â Cochrane Review âSurgical face masks to reduce bacterial contamination of the surgical field: effectiveness and harmsâ identified only the two small RCTs above. Their conclusion was:
âThe small number of trials, together with ⌠low methodological quality and the heterogeneity of interventions, means that there is no reliable evidenceon the effectiveness of wearing ⌠masks to reduce SSI rates
He should have included in the film vapes without the mask followed normal breathing, then talking, and then coughing for comparison.