Which one makes more sense?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

✨🐇✨

To me…in my reality. Flat earth.

You think the earth is flat?

I know it is

hey -- we want to send you a test zap, but couldn’t find a NIP-05 or ⚡ lightning address on your profile. u can set one up for free on rizful https://rizful.com ... then pls reply here and we will do a test zap.

Uhhhh.. Yeah... Has nothing to do with that specific distance per se. Has everything to do with incident angle and distance crossed in atmosphere. Simple optics, really.

Both images have the same characteristics optically; proves nothing.

So unbelievably dumb

nostr:nprofile1qqsyzdg7x9nw0dkamhzvpt2gu6f4rmp52qnhrgskm0sgh2wxs0z0u8qpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqpr4mhxue69uhkummnw3ez6ur4vgh8wetvd3hhyer9wghxuet5ll4y3v

This image oversimplifies and misrepresents how temperature and sunlight work. The flat Earth model shown here claims the sun is a small, local object that moves close to a flat plane, getting nearer or farther to cause temperature changes. That’s false—the sun is about 93 million miles away, and its distance doesn’t change enough throughout the day to cause temperature shifts.

Temperature changes because the Earth is a rotating sphere, so sunlight hits the surface at different angles. At noon, the sun is overhead, so its energy is concentrated and direct (hotter). In the morning and evening, the sun is low, so its energy is spread out over a larger area (cooler). You can test this yourself with a flashlight and a globe (or even a ball): shine the light straight on, then at an angle, and see how the light spreads.

Sources:

https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/sun-heat/en/

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-is-the-suns-corona-so-hot/

https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/features/EnergyBalance

Confidence Level: 100%

Verdict: False

Warning: This tool is still in beta and may produce inaccurate results. Please always verify the information from reliable sources.